Is it me Or the Airbus 320 Dynamics are too fake?

[alrot]

I notice that ,It lift too soon,even without flaps down, It reach 250 knots too easy ,its hard to make it slow to land and the spoiler seems like don't do a very good job ,and the cockpit VC can't move the knobs of HDG,CRS,IAS,etc..and the radio Sucks, I think its could be an exeption comparising with the boeings and Bombardier ..Is it too fake or is it me?

[ThatOnePerson]

To much power and no control basically sums it up

[ATI_7500]

On the other hand, I've heard that an empty A318 basically flies like a fighter jet. Try this with a 737...

[Kaworu]

This is why God gave us addon developers! Eventually, a replacement will be released. For now, just hold tight, and Happy Landings!

[Ravang]

The Airbus has the aero-dynamites of a brick with a rocket engine on it...lol

[CAFedm]

Has it occurred to anyone to substitute another aircraft.cfg gile from a better-behaved A321, or to take AirEd and match up the specs in the Airfile? It wouldn't exactly be a huge project, and might net a better-flying aircraft. Heck, while at it, why not swap in the flight characteristics of the Aircration Trike.

[ATI_7500]

It wouldn't be much work, the minimum requirements would be adapting the new airfile to the default A321's [Contact Points].

Yet then again, the only other freeware A321 out there would be iFDG's. And I doubt that their airfile is any better than the one of the default A321.

[DONTREADMYUSERNAME]

I have the same problem with the Default Airbus. I find it too unresponsive and slow to handle. I find if you turn off the first 3 flight control computers on the overhead panel it responds much much better. But, it is really unrealistic to do this.