No it's not a stupid remark. It's a perfectly valid opinion.**
I don't agree though. See what Craig said in his post about games as well.
And don't forget something else. To you it's a game. To Microsoft it's a global brand which sells for $millions all over the world and makes them a lot of money.
Just like a plumber who does a shoddy job and then asks you for the full amount he quoted (do you pay up - maybe you do....) they are not entitled to make that money just by putting any old product on the shelves, especially if it contains mistakes that they haven't told us about before we gave them our cash. This was supposed to be the most 'communicated about' and tested version of FS ever. That's what they told us anyway.
And from a technical point of view, proper LWMs are pretty fundamental to a program like this.
Anyway, I've said all I'm going to on this one ( except for one more postingin reply to John
** This was a reply to Cobra's posting - John's (tahnks John) came in while I was typing.
..anyone else notice how in FSX the scenery just jut's into the water...FS9 at least has shore lines...It's something that I really find annoying... :-/
I just reckon we should cut them some slack, mapping the planet isnt the easiest job in the world
Did you read my post about three or four up from yours?
....makes it look like a scenery error... :-/
It doesn't "look like" a scenery error...............
......it IS a scenery error! ;D
Wait - maybe those washed-out river areas are supposed to represent greenhouse warming, and may therefore be actually a more representation of things to come!
Except they've messed it up again because the sea levels are ment to rise, not fall to reveal the bedrock of the worlds rivers.
Return to Flight Simulator X (FSX) and Steam
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 568 guests