The space free isnt exact, i have a 350GB hardrive split into a D (250GB) and a C (105ish GB) I found in the demo i just need to keep traffic down and the do the autogen fix, and i can pull 25 frames easy. ;D
Edit: just noticed the gauge on the side, My system : WWOW lol
Last edited by BAW0343 on Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
I hate to be cynical here.... but whom is to benefit if someone runs this "test" and gets told that their computer is a "Wow" when it comes to buying a demanding piece of software?
Please keep in mind the "minimum machine specifications" stipulated for fs2004 and FSX.
Last edited by JBaymore on Sun Oct 15, 2006 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
yea, this thing does not seem accurate enough, now that ive seen other results, 512 mb ram and you got the same rate as me, and i have 2 gigs... Im thinking FSX will not like that you only have 2 gigs. this seems to give an extremely rough guess based on a few things like your processor and video card. oh well... ;D
trouble is, as far as I can tell from here, similar logic is used to determine the automatic defaults set when you first run FSX.
Well worth tinkering with the settings to optimise frame rate against visual content on your particular system. Made a huge difference to mine after trading complexity for performance.