List your system specs and describe how it ran

[alrot]

I have a p3 800mhz 320ram 128 vm an it runs ok.....................................................................................................................................................Im a bad Liar







 what really bothers me is that i have an hour Im downloading it right now , and still 10%I think Ill be here ,and Im gonna have to paid 12 hours(cybercofee) ,the time I presume will take to finish,I bet anyone that it will runs aceptable in my machine  

[alrot]

HERE ITS WHY IM SO SURE

REQUIREMENTS

Processor: 1.0 Ghz I will always overload my procesor Getting 1.2 I bet any athlon (not 64) of 2gb wich I already done docens of time my oldie pc works much better even right now Im fixing one inm my workshop,when I compile anything my pc does faster than any celeron or Athlon
RAM: Windows XP SP2 - 256MBI can set more dimm getting 450mb Max, Windows Vista

[GuitarFreak]

[quote]HERE ITS WHY IM SO SURE

REQUIREMENTS

Processor: 1.0 Ghz I will always overload my procesor Getting 1.2 I bet any athlon (not 64) of 2gb wich I already done docens of time my oldie pc works much better even right now Im fixing one inm my workshop,when I compile anything my pc does faster than any celeron or Athlon
RAM: Windows XP SP2 - 256MBI can set more dimm getting 450mb Max, Windows Vista

[omar777]

today I tried using my IR4 tracker with the demo. It didnt work, hopefully its something that will be supported in the final release. something to add to the list of uncompatible things for the demo. keyword: demo  ;)

[alrot]

[quote]today I tried using my IR4 tracker with the demo. It didnt work, hopefully its something that will be supported in the final release. something to add to the list of uncompatible things for the demo. keyword: demo

[Ridge_Runner_5]

P4 2.8Ghz
2gb PC2700 ram
Radeon X1600 512mb AGP

And its smooooooth!

[jelly2m8]

This should be a good place to post my quick review of FSX.

I posted this up on another board I'm on where I fly with buddies in FS9 quite regularly, so I thought I would share it here.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, I had a chance to play with FSX a bit more. My first assumption wasn't that great, but after playing around a bit I have to say FSX should be really nice once the final version is released.


To get a good feel in the differences between FS9 and FSX I installed my Aerial Foundry CF-188 Hornets into the FSX directory.

The FS9 aircraft worked almost flawlessly in FSX, I had a few issues with some gauges and effects, but to be fair I'm certain I didn't install all the necessary files needed. No biggie, all I wanted was the aircraft anyhow.


First off FSX is layed out alot like FS9. The aircraft selection menu is a bit different, and the graphics settings menus are a bit different also.

The Aircraft selection menu seems like it might be a bit harder to navigate than FS9, but

[cheesegrater]

[quote]HERE ITS WHY IM SO SURE

REQUIREMENTS

Processor: 1.0 Ghz I will always overload my procesor Getting 1.2 I bet any athlon (not 64) of 2gb wich I already done docens of time my oldie pc works much better even right now Im fixing one inm my workshop,when I compile anything my pc does faster than any celeron or Athlon
RAM: Windows XP SP2 - 256MBI can set more dimm getting 450mb Max, Windows Vista

[MOUSY]

This should be a good place to post my quick review of FSX....

Quick...... riiiiighhhttt.
Read that in a jiffy.
By skipping over right after that line.


On normal unchanged settings 6-11 FPS.
Note that FS deemed my hardware only capable of "Minimal" settings and a target lock of 12.

700Mhz AMD Duron
128MB SDRAM
32MB NVidia TNT Pro

I quite possibly have the worst rig setup here. Hope to upgrade within this lifetime.

[congo]

I had some dramas at first, low FPS, but it turned out to be my FFB enabled was causing problems. I don't use it anyway.

It runs a lot better than I expected it would, 25fps with most sliders maxed, 56fps when it's backed off a bit.

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/4540/fsxcon3li1.jpg

[NicksFXHouse]

I had some dramas at first, low FPS, but it turned out to be my FFB enabled was causing problems. I don't use it anyway.

It runs a lot better than I expected it would, 25fps with most sliders maxed, 56fps when it's backed off a bit.

I was just going to post about your frame rate which did not make any sense since I can get 22-24 with dips to 15-18 (10 on hard load) on an x800xt and 35 with dips to 25 on an 7900GTX.. thats with all sliders maxed in scenery except resolution of the mesh and the textures. Mesh is @ 10m and

[congo]

Yes it scared me bad, fine now, and yeah, everything maxed and down on the ground in the buildings and trees it's around 13-15, but as soon as it's in the air it's 20+ so it's fine.

I'm impressed actually, can't wait for the product!

[eno]

Pentium P4 3Ghz ...... 1Gb RAM ...... 256mb X800XL PCI-E

Everything maxed I was getting between 4 and 15FPS with Building Storms weather setting. Averaged around 20 with no weather. Ground textures were somewhat blurred although everything else loaded up beautifully. With tweaking it should be reasonable.

[PisTon]

Pentium P4 3Ghz ...... 1Gb RAM ...... 256mb X800XL PCI-E

Everything maxed I was getting between 4 and 15FPS with Building Storms weather setting. Averaged around 20 with no weather. Ground textures were somewhat blurred although everything else loaded up beautifully. With tweaking it should be reasonable.

The blurred ground is a bug. It only happens with Shaders 2.x water enabled.

[cheesegrater]

On Medium-Low it will lock to 25fps. On High it is between 10 and 20 fps over land.

Also, I get this crap. If I change the display settings it goes away.



3800 X2
Abit AN8 32X
1GB Kingston HyperX PC3200
BFG 6600GT