New Planes

FSX including FSX Steam version.

Re: New Planes

Postby Hagar » Thu May 11, 2006 12:33 pm

The FS2002 Vought Corsair was straight out of CFS2 & I suspect was added as a convenient extra. The Sopwith Camel was in FS98, FS2000 & FS2002 but neither were included with FS9.

As for Concorde, the terrible Paris accident happened some time before FS2002 was released. I suspect that Microsoft no longer wanted to be associated with it. Also, if I remember correctly, the release of FS2002 was delayed by the events of 9/11.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30862
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: New Planes

Postby Katahu » Thu May 11, 2006 3:37 pm

The FS2002 Vought Corsair was straight out of CFS2 & I suspect was added as a convenient extra. The Sopwith Camel was in FS98, FS2000 & FS2002 but neither were included with FS9.

As for Concorde, the terrible Paris accident happened some time before FS2002 was released. I suspect that Microsoft no longer wanted to be associated with it. Also, if I remember correctly, the release of FS2002 was delayed by the events of 9/11.


I read an article on CNN's website that one reporter was testing FS2000 to see how it looked after hearing that the terrorists used it for their training. The guy was awed by its realism and accuracy. After that, M$ decided to rearrange the scenery in FS2002.
User avatar
Katahu
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 10:29 pm

Re: New Planes

Postby vololiberista » Fri May 12, 2006 5:55 am


I read an article on CNN's website that one reporter was testing FS2000 to see how it looked after hearing that the terrorists used it for their training. The guy was awed by its realism and accuracy. After that, M$ decided to rearrange the scenery in FS2002.


One suposes that in order to prevent terroists you would have to reprint all the maps as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia
Image
User avatar
vololiberista
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:43 pm

Re: New Planes

Postby Travis » Wed May 17, 2006 11:12 am

That terrorist stuff is pure garbage . . .

Saying that someone could learn to fly, operate and crash an aircraft into a building (not really that hard, anyway) just from using FS is like saying someone could learn to do drive-by shootings by playing Grand Theft Auto.  There's just no comparison to the real act of doing something so disgusting and vile.

As to this thread's ORIGINAL idea, I've been looking around at what's new aircraft-wise for FSX.  I noticed that they have several new aircraft already shown: Maule, Beaver and Grumman Goose.  I was looking at images of the Goose (trying to get a front-end view) and noticed that in the following two shots, there are two versions of the aircraft: one with outboard floats and one without.

AVSim Shot

FlightSim Shot

Does this point to an increase in multi-model stuff?  In FS9, the only aircraft that have more than one model are the Cessna 208 and the Lockheed Vega.  I'm fairly sure they won't include the Lockheed Vega in the new release, so that leaves the Cessna.  Could it be they are branching out, making more models for the stock aircraft?

I realize that FS is more of a modder's paradise than anything else, but I do think it would be a good idea if the quality of what we buy could be somewhere close to the quality of what's available out there.

For instance, how many of us would simply discard (or render unusable) the stock Goose if it were less visually enticing than one of the others available online?  I know for a fact that if it doesn't match up, I'm simply going to delete it and replace it with the Lynn and Bill Lyons version.  No thought needed.

So where does that leave the stock aircraft?  After all, there are replacements for nearly every single aircraft in FS9, and I KNOW that there are replacements, all freeware, for all the currently known new stock aircraft of FSX.

So are all of the designers over there just getting shafted because they aren't using their talents to the full, or is this the limit of their abilities?  If it is, by all means, go hire Lynn and Bill!  They have the talent and the want to do this stuff, and they're doing it for FREE right now!  They're stomping MS into the dust with their versions of aircraft, and most of it they aren't even getting paid for.

Anyway, that was my rant for the day.  I'm gonna go replace the car oil now. ;)
Image
User avatar
Travis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:17 am
Location: KAUS - 30 MI NW

Re: New Planes

Postby machineman9 » Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:38 pm

[quote]That terrorist stuff is pure garbage . . .

Saying that someone could learn to fly, operate and crash an aircraft into a building (not really that hard, anyway) just from using FS is like saying someone could learn to do drive-by shootings by playing Grand Theft Auto.
User avatar
machineman9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:05 am

Re: New Planes

Postby n_richardson05 » Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:02 am

i the sim would give somone a step up when going into the real world because its not compleatly un familiar
big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right
slew mode dose not count as flying
737-700aholic
User avatar
n_richardson05
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:15 pm
Location: massachussets

Previous

Return to Flight Simulator X (FSX) and Steam

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 527 guests