alert5, about 'glidescope', poor Nexus will be grinding his teeth!
An ILS consists of TWO radio beams. The first, the 'localiser', is a horizontal directional beam (like a VOR) which lines you up. The second - the glides-L-ope', with an 'L'

- is aligned vertically and guides you down to the runway at the correct rate of descent.
About flying manual, commercial pilots like to do as much of it as they can, to stay in practice. Most of them fly the climb out after takeoff manually most of the way to height, for example. But when it comes to landing (depending on how well the airport they're flying to is equipped) they are normally REQUIRED by company and air safety regulations to use the auto systems. I believe that they have to apply for special permission to practise landing manually, and only usually get it a couple of times a month.
Makes entire sense for them to stay in practice really. How would you like to be a passenger on an aircraft where the automatic systems broke down - and find out (the hard way) that the 'Pilot Flying' hadn't actually landed an airliner by hand for the last five years or so?

Generally, if I were you, I'd persevere with 'manual' until you're good at it. You'll get a lot more fun out of FS that way, in the long run; and you'll be able to fly the historical types and any sort of download as well as the 'full auto' default types. AND land at airports which don't have ILS.