

...!
...!

Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720



im only 14 but im going to a highschool where i can get my private pilots licsence.

I believe that Brett (Henderson - above) also uses the sim to keep from getting rusty with certain elements & also for familiarising himself with new airfields

), FS is great practice, but it isn't FAA/European approved as a simulator. Flight dynamics vary in quality from the real thing, and weather isn't always that well simulated (sometimes better than others though). When you go to take your Tests, it may be different from the sim. Not to freak you out, but just don't see FS as a shortcut to getting your license.
I do like your determination, so keep at it! Possibly we will meet someday at a training facility! 


), FS is great practice, but it isn't FAA/European approved as a simulator. Flight dynamics vary in quality from the real thing, and weather isn't always that well simulated (sometimes better than others though). When you go to take your Tests, it may be different from the sim.



If nothing else (to the totally uninitiated), the function of the instruments and the relationships bewtween; pitch/roll/airspeed/altitude/vertical-speed/heading, can be experienced in a sim. That alone makes it a valuable training tool. Also, the cockpit/situational awareness deal can be exerienced in more than the abstract. Approaching an airport; Pattern entry and flying (dealing with winds); Setting up an approach in an exagerated cross-wind (crab-angles in general); Transitions from cruise to climb and back again (or, rolling in and out of a turn and nailing a new heading), relative to trimming (and re-trimming)... and getting grasp on the mantra, "everything that you can, or cannot do with your aiplane is a function of its airspeed"..
Further... radio navigation in the sim is extremely accurate. Tracking VOR radials; finding VOR intersections, and/or fixes; entering holds properly (and flying several laps) with significant winds aloft. Compass turns, too. MSFS replicates compass errors, perfectly.
And of course, instrument procedures. You can sit with plates handy, and a drill yourself on flying precision/non-precision approaches to the letter. Procedure turns, timed descents, published misses. If you wanna talk about time-compression, try flying a complex ILS, in 1 mile visibilty and a serious cross-wind, BY THE PLATE (no improvising), when your NAV radio quits and you had better be on the proper course/altitude/vertical-speed/airspeed, so that the timer (that you didn't forget to start at the FAF) can get you down to decision height, safely. Praticing that stuff will save you a fortune in dual-time (and safety-pilot time)when you're chasing your instrument rating.






Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 298 guests