second, i wonder why microsoft clever enough to release fsx if there is hardly any hardware compatible to run fsx to the max?
This is, forgive my impudence, a naive question. Ever since windows 3.0 M$ has justified their shoddy coding behind the NEED for more CPU power, more memory, more HD, more videocard, more etcetera, in one of the purest manifestation of consumerist frenzy.
It's my humble opinion that the REAL corporative rule in M$ goes more or less along these ways:
ALWAYS the end users have followed our sometimes absurd requests with no excessive complaints, correct?
So, seen that the formula works, why learn to code right now? Put together something that looks a LITTLE better than the previous version, don't lose your time making it run good (they will run to buy new hardware to
patch our coding negligence) nor even coherently (that's what service packs are for) and publish it NOW. Fresh money MUST be kept entering our bank account, no matter what.
And that is that.
I (speaking for myself) am getting
sick and tired of following their inability to do a thing right, expecting like a divine right for us to patch their shoddiness with our money. Were they surgeons in a hospital, by now they would have ended up in jail for having killed their patients. Were they shoemakers, by now they would have ended up in bankruptcy. Instead, as they work with computers and have a monopoly over very consumerist people, they are filthy rich without having earned it.
I repeat, what I said above is my opinion. You don't have to share it, if you don't want.
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.
At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".
Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
