The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby visualchaosfx » Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:48 pm

Oh K!

Since I bought the PMDG 747, I have grown to love and respect this line of aircraft. I've also been learning how to use the FMC and stuff. Now, I just thought for kicks I would try and fly the default 747 thats included with FS2004. Once I was in the virtual cockpit of the default 747, I felt lost. No FMC. No overhead panel with all of the switches on it. The MCP was sort of different.

Why didn't Microsoft design the planes to be like their real world counterparts? I mean this is a flight simulator. Its supposed to simulate the real and in my opinion, Microsoft did a half ass job of making this aircraft. When engaging the flaps in the default 747, its quick but the PMDG actually takes time for the flaps to fully extend to whatever degree its set on. The default, you use the GPS. The PMDG you use the FMC.

It doesn't make sense to me for a company to make a simulator and not have the planes mirror the real world counterparts.

Anyways, why do they do things like that?
Systemax Desktop Computer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Duel Core Processor 4600+
2.41 GHz
2GB of Ram
250GB Hard Drive
80GB Hard Drive
Windows XP Professional
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB PCI-E (2 DVI)
SoundBlaster Audigy SE So
User avatar
visualchaosfx
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:37 am
Location: Michigan

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby ashaman » Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:23 pm

Basically the reason is twofold.

On a first level there's the fact that a REALLY well made plane would cost them more to realize.

On the second level there's the fact that the 95% of the buyers of FS things are godd as they are.

So why bother.

As real as it gets.

NOT!
Last edited by ashaman on Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby JBaymore » Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:33 pm

The blessing and the curse of the plethora of freeware and payware developers for FS2004 (and X and whatever) is that they are always available to fix the stuff Microsoft does not do well.
Last edited by JBaymore on Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby visualchaosfx » Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:41 pm

Ok I get it out. But still though. Companies such as these should care about the product and not rely on others to provide fixes for their lack of attention to detail. That would be like a pizza place making there pizzas half ass and expecting the customers or neighbors to make the pizza better.

Hmmm..... I'm hungry now lol.
Systemax Desktop Computer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Duel Core Processor 4600+
2.41 GHz
2GB of Ram
250GB Hard Drive
80GB Hard Drive
Windows XP Professional
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB PCI-E (2 DVI)
SoundBlaster Audigy SE So
User avatar
visualchaosfx
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:37 am
Location: Michigan

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby Sir_Crashalot » Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:26 pm

Ok I get it out. But still though. Companies such as these should care about the product and not rely on others to provide fixes for their lack of attention to detail. That would be like a pizza place making there pizzas half ass and expecting the customers or neighbors to make the pizza better.

Hmmm..... I'm hungry now lol.


On the other hand if Microsoft would have made the sim with airplanes at PMDG (or any other  developer) quality, you would have paid a few hunderd Euro/Dollars for it. Now they can sell the sim for less then 100 Euro/Dollar (FSX DeLuxe 64 Euro, FS2004 13 Euro).

Crash ;)
Sir_Crashalot
 

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby born_2_fly » Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:44 am

Ok I get it out. But still though. Companies such as these should care about the product and not rely on others to provide fixes for their lack of attention to detail. That would be like a pizza place making there pizzas half ass and expecting the customers or neighbors to make the pizza better.

Hmmm..... I'm hungry now lol.


On the other hand if Microsoft would have made the sim with airplanes at PMDG (or any other  developer) quality, you would have paid a few hunderd Euro/Dollars for it. Now they can sell the sim for less then 100 Euro/Dollar (FSX DeLuxe 64 Euro, FS2004 13 Euro).

Crash ;)


Very true. And do remember, Microsoft would have to do every aircraft to this standard, and the price would sky-rocket to round
born_2_fly
 

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby JBaymore » Fri Feb 16, 2007 5:27 am

[quote]On the other hand if Microsoft would have made the sim with airplanes at PMDG (or any other
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: The default 747 vs The PMDG 747

Postby FridayChild » Fri Feb 16, 2007 5:44 am

Why didn't Microsoft design the planes to be like their real world counterparts? [...] Microsoft did a half ass job of making this aircraft [...] It doesn't make sense to me for a company to make a simulator and not have the planes mirror the real world counterparts. Anyways, why do they do things like that?

Surely we can't be expected to answer a such question? Anyway, besides FS2004 being a phased out product, I don't think that, despite the often quoted slogan "As real as it gets", its purpouse was ever to "be like the real world counterpart". FS has always been a compromise between a game and a simulator, and was always sold at "popular" prices. And it was intentionally left open to external addons of various kinds. Cut them some slack.  ;)
Founder of A.A.A.A.A.A.A. (Aircraft Amateurs' Association Against Absurd Aviation Acronyms) My system specifications: FLIGHT SIMULATOR 2004 - AMD Athlon 64 3200+ CPU - 3 GB PC-3200 DDR400 dual channel RAM - 500 GB Seagate B
User avatar
FridayChild
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1570
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:22 am
Location: Italia


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 305 guests