"Missed Approach"

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

"Missed Approach"

Postby Falcon500 » Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:59 pm

I'll give you the run down on what just happened as of a few minutes ago. ;)



I took off frim CYAM with real-world weather (not important but it was a 13kt wind at 305*) Headed towards KDFW.


As I flew my #1 engine quit (big surprise  ;) ) i tried to restart it, my attempt was futile, i diverted to the nearest long airport KBFA.

I set the aileron trim and gave it a bit of right rudder trim. all normal, also changed the elevator trim as i wasnt going to fast.

as i made a real short final (probably under four miles) i hit the gear and the flaps, and started gliding in with quarter power (more than i usually do for obvious reasons)

as i looked down at the airspeed indicator i noticed it was a tad to slow (around 105kts  :o) i hit the gas and as the 737 twisted because of un even thrust distrubution i hit the rudder and flew INTO the end of the runway at a ninty degree offset from my flight path.

and the stall buzzer never went off  ::)
What do I do you ask? I struggle! Then destroy! Then try to put back together what I just broke on accident.....




                       The GMax effect[img]http://ww
User avatar
Falcon500
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Northern Michigan, USA

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby wji » Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:09 pm

So? . . . what's the problem?
Just hit CTRL+; and start all over; after all, it's only a game.

" . . .  and the stall buzzer never went off"
Well, thank god for that!  ::)
Image PhotoShop 7 user
User avatar
wji
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:27 am

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby Brett_Henderson » Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:30 pm

I flew the default 737 and tried landing on one engine.. a long time ago. I remember aborting an approach way out (probably 3 miles) and remember that powering back up, at or near stall-speed, with the gear down and full flaps, was NOT what I expected. Yaw was uncontrolable.. not enough altitude to try anything else.. I stalled and crashed. I don't remember if the horn went off or not. I do know that the sim's flight model is realistic enough to account for AoA and the plane's configuration (i.e. flaps/gear down). I "think" what the sim does, as far as sounding the horn, is that it waits until the actual lift vector, relative to gravity, reaches a minimum.  I know for certain, it will give you accellerated stalls with eery accuracy.

I "think" that since you were descending, with flaps down and with some power applied (and probably pitched nose down a little, fighting the rudder and aileron correction for the one engine approach).. you'd have had to have dropped below 100kias before a stall would happen (in the sim).

Now the funny thing..  I related this story to a pilot friend in Florida (who has flown a 737).. and he cringed when I talked about adding full power, in landing configuration, on one engine..

"They don't like that", he said..
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby Nexus » Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:22 am

Why do you have full flap with one engine out?
Select flaps 15 and add some rudder trim and you can basically land the plane quite normal.  :)

In the real bird you can even use the autopilot and have it capture the LOC and GS (but not autoland available)
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby ashaman » Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:51 am

Now the funny thing..  I related this story to a pilot friend in Florida (who has flown a 737).. and he cringed when I talked about adding full power, in landing configuration, on one engine..

"They don't like that", he said..


I'm not a pilot and the thought makes me cringe too. The  full brunt of a engine the like of the 737's (and in planes with more powerful engines the thing is bound to be even more pronounced) in asymmetric thrust would be hellish to counteract, even more so in the slow speeds of landing. You might not have enough rudder authority to keep yourself straight and things WOULD get ugly. ;)
Last edited by ashaman on Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby RAFAIR100 » Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:43 pm

In the good old far-off days, they used to teach us to apply the acronym CATE - Check the yaw, Adjust power to maintain safe flying speed, Trim, and Examine for the cause of engine failure.       You have to adjust the power EARLY.     Let the speed drop and you may not have enough rudder trim - or rudder power - to counteract the yaw when you do eventually get round to upping the power.      One trip in a Mosquito with one out is a recommended method of learning why this acronym is so valuable.
RAFAIR100
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 2:12 pm

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby Falcon500 » Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:55 pm

the reason i had full flaps it was a short runway (for me) and i was decending over 1000 feet per second :o , as i said it was a REAL short final
What do I do you ask? I struggle! Then destroy! Then try to put back together what I just broke on accident.....




                       The GMax effect[img]http://ww
User avatar
Falcon500
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1021
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Northern Michigan, USA

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby NicksFXHouse » Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:31 am

1 feet per second = 0.592483801 knots

over 1000FPS decent rate would mean you were in a nose dive... full on and throttled @ 600+knots

them must be good flaps because they certainly blew out well before the landing gear did   ;D
NicksFXHouse
 

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby Mees » Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:19 am

::) ::) :P
Image
AMD Athlon 4200+ :: Gigabyte K8n-SLi :: 1GB RAM :: 7900GTX 512MB
User avatar
Mees
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3659
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Netherlands, the

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby DaveSims » Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:00 pm

There is a thing when flying multi-engine aircraft known as minimum single engine airspeed.  Below that speed there is not enough air flow over the rudder to counteract the assymetrical thrust.  Needless to say, 100 kts is too slow for a 737.  In the event of an engine failure, you should keep a higher approach speed.  Whether that means using less flaps is entirely up to the pilot, but in real life I rarely use full flaps.  
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby ashaman » Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:27 pm

As Davysims says, and if the runway is too short... you better have a viable alternate or be ready for a unplanned country outing. ;D
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby vololiberista » Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:00 pm

I'm sorry to say you are "dead" and all your passengers along with you!!!

Take the VC10 for example; It can do an approach with two engines out even with 35
Andiamo in Italia
Image
User avatar
vololiberista
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:43 pm

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby TerryUK » Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:32 pm

Mmmmm.   I never get engine problems as I pay the maintanence crew extra to keep eveything ticketyboo ;D
Mind you - yesterday I did get a couple of oil pressure lights flash on at 2000ft but they soon went out!!    As for the stall buzzer - I deleted that irritating noise moons ago.
Last edited by TerryUK on Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TerryUK
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Dorset, UK

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby vololiberista » Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:47 pm

 As for the stall buzzer - I deleted that irritating noise moons ago.


That's very naughty!!!!  Don't do it again!!!!
Remember G-ARPI in 1966?
The slats were pulled in accidentally well below flap retraction speed.  Just about everything went off in the cockpit (probably!! --- We don't know for sure. It was this disaster that made cockpit voice recorders mandatory!!!) The stick shaker and pusher activated 3 times. So instead of going with it they cancelled the stick shaker and died!!!
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia
Image
User avatar
vololiberista
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:43 pm

Re: "Missed Approach"

Postby TerryUK » Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:27 pm

I don't really need the buzzer as I never stall anything  
however I reinSTALLed it for the sake of authenticity!!!!

I think the air crash you refer to was The Staines event in 1972 with a distraught Captain Key in command?  There had been an anti-union diagreement before takeoff & amongst the wreckage some anti-Key scribblings had been found?   A cutting comment was to the effect of who will represent God in BEA upon his demise.  Some cardiac anomolies were found at his postmortem I think, denoting a possible silent myocardial infarction.  They never did find out who retracted the slats I am told.   Just goes to show how work-place stress can be a killer in more ways than one.  
TerryUK
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:15 am
Location: Dorset, UK

Next

Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests