saying good by

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

saying good by

Postby n_richardson05 » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:51 pm

ok with the release of fsx tomorow i am curently saying a sad good by to a game that has been great. it has been my real introducton to the fs universe.  Im flying the default aircraft and just rememberig the good old un modified fs2004. but it wont be missed for long i cant stand playing any game of witch there is a better more up to date vershion if unless fsx is so complicated for my pc that it is un playable. but the sun is setting on the century of flight. i know alot of you will stick with fs2004. i envy your resistince to the new shiny edition. but i am weak for i will try to endure the headaches of runing it on my poor over worked pc. for now it looks like the end of this game for me adleast    
big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right
slew mode dose not count as flying
737-700aholic
User avatar
n_richardson05
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:15 pm
Location: massachussets

Re: saying good by

Postby ashaman » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:58 pm

Beware of the shiny things. Not all is gold, what shines. ;D
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: saying good by

Postby microlight » Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:17 am

OK, enjoy. But I wouldn't be able to see the pleasure in driving a Bugatti Veyron with two flat tyres and sugar in the fuel tank, rather than a perfectly-working Mercedes-Benz SLR, other than to be able to say that I have a Bugatti Veyron. Real frustration potential here. Might be worth reading some of the posts in the FSX forum before you make a final decision.

In case anybody's wondering: I haven't got either vehicle (sob) - it's merely symbolic of FSX and FS9. Fact of life is that (as others have said in these fora) I'm not spending vast amounts of hard-earned cash in buying new hardware for a simulator to be able to run it properly, when my current 2gHz/Radeon 9200SE rig runs FS9 well enough.

You might be back!

;)
User avatar
microlight
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 6:24 pm
Location: Southern UK

Re: saying good by

Postby Zaphod » Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:34 am

I'm with Microlight.
I've got too much time and effort invested in FS9 to ditch it now, just because there's a new version available. And of coarse there's the fact that "she who must be obeyed" has said my current PC will have to last a while longer yet! ;D
Hey ho.
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. But why take the risk?
Windows 10
Intel i7 950 3.06Ghz (8mb Cache)
MSI X58 Pro-E MoBo
MSI GeForce GTX 1050ti oc
Corsair MXS
User avatar
Zaphod
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 4:05 pm
Location: U.K.

Re: saying good by

Postby Fozzer » Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:30 am

I have both FS2004 and FSX installed on my Hard drive...;D...!

Occasionally, I fire up FSX and weep.... :'(...!

...then very quickly I fire up FS 2004 and that's where I stay for the rest of the day running flat-out and admiring all the fantastic scenery with a big smile in my face... ;D...!

.....JOY!....LOL... ;D...!

Paul.... 8)...!

P.S. ..I've tried to add some of my favourite FS 2002/FS 2004 aircraft to FSX....
....the older models are not compatible...arse!....:'(...!

Tip: Keep FS 2004 on your Hard Drive until you completly upgrade your computer to be able to run FSX as good as your old FS 2004...)...!
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27369
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: saying good by

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:42 am

I have both FS9 and FSX...FSX I need time to install...LOL...I'll definately stick to FS9 for a long time though 8) 8)
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

Re: saying good by

Postby ozzy72 » Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:52 am

I'll muddle along for the moment until I get the new computer with DX10 and dear old Vista (whenever it comes out)....
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: saying good by

Postby commoner » Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:49 am

...mm...enjoying the sim for a while longer........mostly cos I got my old rusty C172 to work in there........... couldn't leave her behind................commoner :D

Image
total upload size: 42039 bytes
Image"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is."
User avatar
commoner
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:26 am
Location: Yorkshire. England. UK.

Re: saying good by

Postby Poseidon » Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:44 am

I am not an easy upgrader. In fact I sticked to FS2002 when FS2004 was new. I guess I will do the same with FS2004 now that FSX is being introduced. I will prefer a stabilized, free of problems software which will offer me what has been offering so far: a great time and gameplay rather than better graphics.

Things are even more complicated if we consider third party addons like squawkbox, FSP etc. Not to mention the money I would need to upgrade my 3Ghz/128MB nvidia system to something more powerful and I don't see what is the added value using a the very good in graphics FSX if I have to reduce my settings to the minimum in order to have it running smoothly.
Poseidon
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 4:52 am
Location: Athens, Hellas

Re: saying good by

Postby vololiberista » Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:53 am

Frankly there's no point in acquiring FSX until DX10. None of the screenshots I've seen better FS9. The sea is the MOST unrealistic I have ever seen!!!!!!!
The important things like ATC etc haven't changed. So the only "improvement" is graphics!   Most people seem to have to turn those Graphics off in order to get more than one frame a month. Money wasted in my view. I can get 17fps on my 1.2 gig cpu with FX440. Just upgrading a HD and new MB in itself is a nightmare with XP let alone Vista etc. It'll be a good 12 months before i might consider FSX. It's better for me to improve my system as is and have a good smoothly flowing sim.
Vololiberista
Andiamo in Italia
Image
User avatar
vololiberista
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:43 pm

Re: saying good by

Postby MattNW » Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:51 pm

I'm staying too. FSX is designed to work best with Vista and DX10. Since Vista isn't out yet and no graphics cards are available for DX10 it's a no brainer. I'll wait until there is hardware and software capable of running FSX before I buy it.
In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
User avatar
MattNW
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 2:34 pm
Location: Indiana

Re: saying good by

Postby Franky_4_Fingers » Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:51 am

As is usually the case, when a new FS comes out it's time for a new rig. I just got one in July so i'm curious how FSX would run on it.
I also agree with Microlight, mostly cause he's got Emma Peel in his profile. ;D
PS: I love you Emma!  :-*
User avatar
Franky_4_Fingers
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:22 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 355 guests