767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby tennm1980 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:31 pm

Ive been FS'ing for years now. I like commercial jets, especially the large ones, like the 747 and A330, have no problem with take off, approach, landing etc. I just downloaded a Boeing 767-400, and I have never flown anything with flight dynamics like this, the closest would have to be the Air Force refueling tanker, but I still handled that quite well. Is this true in the RW? I can barely get this thing in to any type of bank to turn it.
tennm1980
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Bristol TN (KTRI)

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby Foxtrot Sport » Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:40 pm

Where'd you download it from?

Project Opensky by anychance?
Image
Formerly HighFlyer24
User avatar
Foxtrot Sport
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Sacramento, California

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby tennm1980 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:51 pm

Im pretty sure its a Opensky model, Im at work at the moment, but im 99% positive it is. Its in the factory Boeing Livery.
tennm1980
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Bristol TN (KTRI)

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby elite marksman » Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:11 pm

Make sure that the LVL, HDG, and NAV hold switches are off, if they are on, the autopilot won't allow the plane to bank.
elite marksman
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:35 pm

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby tennm1980 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:38 pm

Right, they are all off. I can barely bank the plane when autopilot is off. I took off from JFK for LAX, the plane stalled between 7-8 degree climb rate at full thrust. I understand that the plane IS a "heavy", but Ive never flown anything like this, it handles worse than an Antonov Transporter.
tennm1980
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Bristol TN (KTRI)

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby flyboy 28 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:41 pm

Hmm. Did you accidentaly change something in the .cfg? I've done that a few times and messed up many a good plane.. ::)
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10266
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby tennm1980 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:52 pm

Ive only messed with one .cfg file, long ago, and ive stayed far away from it after that :-)  From your (or anyones) opinion, is the 764 completely different from other heavies? I ace the 744 and A333, but Im lost on the 764.
tennm1980
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Bristol TN (KTRI)

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby Flt.Lt.Andrew » Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:29 pm

Try reinstalling- it shouldn't be THAT different. Sure, its a slow aeroplane in terms of handling, but maybe something has gone wrong...



A.
Flt.Lt.Andrew
 

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby tennm1980 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:37 pm

thanks all, gonna reinstall
tennm1980
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Bristol TN (KTRI)

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby flyboy 28 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:32 pm

Well you shouldn't need to reinstall if it's just that one plane that's giving you trouble. Delete it from the Aircraft folder and download it again.

Cyberspace, ya know?
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10266
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby Triple_7 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:38 pm

If its a Posky 767 its probably just underpowered.  I found that will all their 767s :-/  Even the real world thrust is to little for them.  Not sure why but I'm guessing theres probably a variable wrong in the .cfg   I usualy add a couple thousand extra pounds of thrust to the point where its not overpowerd but will accualy cruise at .82 like its supposed to ;)  As for banking I haven't had that problem with them ???
Triple_7
 

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby Foxtrot Sport » Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:48 am

After you've selected your aircraft, and are back at the create a flight screen, check the 'fuel and payload'.  Play around with the options, and see if at first it gives you a:

'Warning: Plane is 523,562,793,692lbs overweight'

or something of the sort.
Image
Formerly HighFlyer24
User avatar
Foxtrot Sport
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Sacramento, California

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby Flt.Lt.Andrew » Sun Feb 12, 2006 3:47 am

Dude, not a total reinstall! I mean just reinstall the plane!



A.
Flt.Lt.Andrew
 

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby commoner » Sun Feb 12, 2006 4:49 am

..mmm.....I seem to remember a similar happening some while ago..........think that was a Posky too but maybe somebody will recall it...........in the end I remember we borrowed an air file from another similar aircraft and it flew very well after that..........

My old memory banks aren't what they were but I have just for fun tried it with a 777 air file by renaming it to the right name and backing up the original first............flies a treat now....

.....or if you have AirEd you could modify the .air file .......up the Control surfaces effectiveness by say 50 that will also make it turn better...........commoner. ;)
Last edited by commoner on Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is."
User avatar
commoner
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3221
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:26 am
Location: Yorkshire. England. UK.

Re: 767-400 vs Any other heavy?

Postby Ivan » Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:59 am

[quote]If its a Posky 767 its probably just underpowered.
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Next

Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 303 guests