altitude

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

altitude

Postby juanca » Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:03 pm

I would like to know how to calculate de best altitude at wich i
juanca
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 4:11 pm

Re: altitude

Postby Nexus » Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:26 pm

Okay. Which aircrafts, and what's the routings and your take-off weights?  :)

But if we have to get general here, most aircrafts feels comfortable at ANY weight between FL320-360 (somewhere around there) but it wont be the most optimal altitude in some cases.

Example: FL360 is a little too high for a fully loaded Boeing 767. I'm currently flying over the North Atlantic and I'm heavily loaded so the FMC has my optimal altitude at FL320. I have to fly another hour or so before I can step-climb to FL360.
Meanwhile, FL320 is too low for a light Boeing 737NG, which is likely to cruise at FL370+ if the route allows that

:)
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: altitude

Postby Hussein Patwa » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:35 am

Also just a quick rule of thumb.  Don't know if this is correct globally, but it certainly states so in the KLM pilot's manuals:

For IFR flights:
Even flight levels when flying headings between 180 and 360 degrees, e.g FL300, FL320, FL340.
Odd flight levels when flying headings between 001 and 179 degrees, e.g FL310, FL330, FL350.

The initial top cruise altitude will be set based on the heading sector for the majority of the flight, although it is subject to alteration by regional ATC.

Hope that helps.

Hussein.
Hussein Patwa
PatwaNet
MSFS Version: FS2004

My Addons:
PMDG: 737, 747
Level-D: 767
PSS: 777
Perfect Flight: A380
FSUIPC (Registered), FSPassengers, FS2Crew Pro 737, eDimensional Voice Buddy, UK2000, Just Traff
Hussein Patwa
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 5:01 pm
Location: Aberdeen, UK

Re: altitude

Postby Nexus » Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:13 am

Hussein, those levels are RVSM (FL290-FL410), and not all parts of the world have that implemented yet, although Eurocontrol has been doing it since 2002, hence your KLM manuals states those flight levels
Last edited by Nexus on Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: altitude

Postby Hussein Patwa » Fri Feb 03, 2006 12:34 pm

Hello.  Thanks for clearing that up Nexus.  As youmay have guessed, I am not a real-world pilot, but was fortunate to have a pretty damn good flying experience complete with trimmings on a trcent trip to Amsterdam, hence my access to the flight manuals, etc.
Hussein Patwa
PatwaNet
MSFS Version: FS2004

My Addons:
PMDG: 737, 747
Level-D: 767
PSS: 777
Perfect Flight: A380
FSUIPC (Registered), FSPassengers, FS2Crew Pro 737, eDimensional Voice Buddy, UK2000, Just Traff
Hussein Patwa
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 5:01 pm
Location: Aberdeen, UK

Re: altitude

Postby juanca » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:06 pm

I fly the 737 from MHTG to KMIA
the flight planner programs an altitude of 9000ft!!!

ofcourse this is too low!  i guess 32000 to 39000ft would be the correct altitude.

but thats only my guess cause I want to know how to calculate the right altitude.

and why does the flight planner give me so low altitudes and how can i avoid this cause I dont know you guys this is a little annoying.... :-*
juanca
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 4:11 pm

Re: altitude

Postby Chris_F » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:40 pm

[quote]I fly the 737 from MHTG to KMIA
the flight planner programs an altitude of 9000ft!!!

ofcourse this is too low!
Chris_F
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1364
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 5:59 pm

Re: altitude

Postby Nexus » Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:24 pm

But that's so dumb...I thought "high altitude airways" meant +18000ft?
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: altitude

Postby JerryH » Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:42 pm

If you find the real performance values for your aircraft, they may not help you because the FS model may not be accurate enough.

I prefer to do a flight test of the FS model to see how it actually performs in the simulator. Here's how I determine the maximum cruise altitude of any FS jet aircraft:

- First, be sure the aircraft is full of fuel at max takeoff gross weight.

- Takeoff and climb to the highest possible altitude, using the autothrottle or max climb power.

- Reduce the climb rate (VSI) as required to maintain the correct indicated airspeed (or Mach number).

- I measure ceiling altitude as the point where the climb rate is 1000 fpm and airspeed (or Mach) can no longer be maintained.

This is just the way I do it. The climb rate at ceiling altitude is somewhat arbitrary. Someone else may use a more precise definition for minimum climb rate, but since the FS model isn't perfect, the climb rate definition doesn't have to be perfect.

If your flight is short and the fuel load is reduced, then the ceiling altitude will obviously be higher. To know for sure, rerun the flight test at a lower fuel weight.

Give it a try and see how close you get to the published performance of your B737.

Regards,
JerryH
JerryH
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 2:31 pm


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 341 guests