Graphics

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

Graphics

Postby igs942 » Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:16 am

Hi all

I am looking to buy a new desktop PC within the next few months and I need some advice on hardware specs. Ideally I would like graphics to match the piccies from the likes of the screenshot contests. Can I get away with 512Mb RAM and a 128Mb card or will I need more???

Cheers
User avatar
igs942
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 792
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:28 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Graphics

Postby ashaman » Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:58 am

A 128Mb DX9 compliant video card is more than enough for FS9 like for the vast majority of other games around. The extra memory on some video card is in fact still unused even from the more advanced games out there.

When in the future that amount of video memory will be required to run games better, it would be a better policy to upgrade to a more powerful card with more memory than remaining with a by then underpowered albeit still memory capable video card.

For the system memory I suggest you to buy as much as you can, yes 512Mb are enough but if you can buy more it would only be good for you and your Flight Simulator.
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: Graphics

Postby Delta_ » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:10 am

As long as the GFX card is a seperate one, like a 6600gt then you will be ok.  Don't be fooled by on-board graphics like Intel Extreme graphics as these won't benefit you at all in 3D applications.
Last edited by Delta_ on Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Delta_
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 6:40 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Graphics

Postby wji » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:54 am

"Don't be fooled by on-board graphics . . ."
Right on! Couldn't have said it better myself.
Bill
P.S. go for 1G RAM
Image PhotoShop 7 user
User avatar
wji
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 11:27 am

Re: Graphics

Postby _526th_Fireman » Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:31 am

If buying a desktop, buy at the upper end of the desktops from HP, Compaq, VAIO or whatever you choose. Lower end desktops are for very general use, upper end are adaptable if not already set up to go gaming.

128 MB Vid. card is plenty, but make sure it is DX9 compliant, that means a relatively newer card, not the older ones.

1 GIG System RAM is a must in my opinion. 512  MB is barely enough if using XP. It is enough, but barely.......and believe me, you are going to get 1GIG even if you start off with 512, so why not do it now!

It would also be in your interest to try and get one that already has a GOOD Sound card already installed in it. If the desktop comes with a good set of speakers, that's a plus for you, if not, look into those too.

Now remember, some of those screenshots you saw are coming off of higher resolution monitors, and probably a good portion of them off LCDs or Plasmas. So if you are getting a CRT(big box) you won't get your moneys worth from the graphics card or system. It will look good with a CRT, but man the difference with an LCD blew me away.

Just things to consider!! Good luck and happy shopping!

;D
Systemax Sabre Ultimate gaming rig.

I got all the goodies and all the power I need to run anything thrown at me for the next two months!
User avatar
_526th_Fireman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1142
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:41 am
Location: Joshua Texas

Re: Graphics

Postby igs942 » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:01 pm

Many thanks to all who replied. I have been looking around and there is an HP model I'm interested in which is the M1190. In HP's specs it quotes the graphics card as follows:

Video graphics

ATI Radeon X600 pro
256 MB DDR memory
PCI-Express interface
I/O Ports: DVI, S-Video (S-VHS only - integrated tv encoder)

Is this gonna be ok for the job??? The processor is a Pentium 4 (3.4 GHZ) and it has 1Gig RAM.

Cheers
User avatar
igs942
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 792
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:28 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Graphics

Postby Graycat8524 » Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:49 pm

Heya IGS,

Ohhh Yes!  Those specs are great for FS 2004...When I finally get my IRS refund I'm going to install the same hardware in my PC!
Graycat8524
 

Re: Graphics

Postby igs942 » Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:19 am

Hi all,

Thanks again for the info before. One last thing though - is there any visual difference between the NVIDIA GeForce 6200 and the 6600???

Cheers

Ian
User avatar
igs942
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 792
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:28 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Graphics

Postby Tom_M » Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:34 am

6600's faster and MAY have more pixel pipelines (=more speed) - that's the only difference, so you can turn more settings to High.. technically it does make a difference in that way, but in terms of visual processing technology, both cards use Shader Model 3 (AFAIK).
-Games PC-
AMD 3200+ (due for replacement)
1GB RAM
256MB 7600GS Overclocked
Tom_M
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 2:38 pm
Location: Local airport EGSX

Re: Graphics

Postby || Andy || » Sat Jun 04, 2005 3:09 pm

This needs to be in the Hardware forum..

But X850 for money.... 6600 for money.. or 6800
|| Andy ||
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2613
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:55 am
Location: Shropshire, United Kingdom


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 203 guests