by RollerBall » Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:39 pm
Just clarifying what Derek has said. Take Cambridge EGSC as an example. It only has ILS on Rwy 23. However, this does not mean that you can't do an ILS landing on Rwy 05 - you can, using the back-beam from the 23 ILS.
But because it's a back beam, your primary ILS instrument, the localiser, works in an opposite sense. So when you are established on the localiser during your approach you click on BC (back course) which makes the aircraft respond in the opposite sense as well, turning left when it needs to and not right, which would be rather embarrassing ::)
As Derek says, if you are flying a manual approach you have to compensate manually and also back courses don't have GS (glide slope) data, so you have to monitor this visually.
This does not mean that you can't do ILS BC approaches at night or in IFR conditions (subject to your minimums) because approach ATC assist you from a long way out. They say things like 'Golf Alpha Charlie, your height is X thousand feet (assuming you don't have a mode charlie transponder on board) and you have Y miles to run. Turn left 235 degrees and establish a 3 degree glide slope'
Then later during the descent they say 'Golf Alpha Charlie, you have Z miles to run, heading is good, height should be 3500' as you come down the glide slope that they told you to get on. As PIC you are supposed to know what AS and rate of descent will give you the required 3 degree GS.
Lots and lots of fun....