by Gary R. » Sun Oct 03, 2004 9:49 am
Yes, charts would make more sense of it. All intersections are always defined by a vor radial and dme from that vor. Some intersections use triangulations of 2 vor radials and dme readings from those vors. It used to be confusing to me until a co-worker was cleaning out his desk and he found an airway manuel of my home region, Pennsylvainia, USA and gave it to me knowning I like flightsimming. Its a 1998 copy but so far, everything is still accurate up to FS9. Smaller airports that don't have navaids are also located in the same manner as interesections and fixes. An area vor, a radial from that vor, and a dme reading. Its fairly simpleonce you get onto it. FMC's also navagate that way to in that you must enter a beginning of an airway and then close it with a vor at the other end.
AMD 2800xp on gigabyte vt600l k7 triton overclocked @ 2.3 ghz, 768 PC 3200, 128 DDR 6600GT AGP, 60 gig,5200 rpm maxtor, 160gig 7200rpm WD, Sony FD Trinitron 19