Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Scenery, Utilities, Misc... Whatever else you would like to find for your FS or CFS Programs.

Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby dienkonig » Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:28 pm

somthing id really like to see in FSX
Last edited by dienkonig on Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
dienkonig
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:36 am

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby todayshorse » Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:44 pm

Im not sure about the aircraft carrier for fllight sim, but im staggered at the possible aircraft that may or may not be used on this thing. Im sure we here devised the V/TOL and proved it in combat against quite a few detractors. Yet its inferior to the F-18??? Or am i reading that wrong????

I just dont buy that, despite the fact the sea harrier is no more....maybe in range and top speed, but air to air i bet it would runs rings round the hornet. It did against just about everything the US had at the time and every thing the argentinians had.

And im guessing the typhoon wont be top of the list either ::)

I know i shouldnt maybe comment on this here but i was quite shocked to read all this!
Last edited by todayshorse on Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
todayshorse
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2808
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:10 pm
Location: England

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby dienkonig » Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:17 am

Im not sure about the aircraft carrier for fllight sim, but im staggered at the possible aircraft that may or may not be used on this thing. Im sure we here devised the V/TOL and proved it in combat against quite a few detractors. Yet its inferior to the F-18??? Or am i reading that wrong????

I just dont buy that, despite the fact the sea harrier is no more....maybe in range and top speed, but air to air i bet it would runs rings round the hornet. It did against just about everything the US had at the time and every thing the argentinians had.

And im guessing the typhoon wont be top of the list either ::)

I know i shouldnt maybe comment on this here but i was quite shocked to read all this!




the JSF has been confirmed as the first plane to serve on it, and the construction is going ahead now, it would be a shame if it wasnt built. but with economics and all....

VTOL aircraft have less range. especially since the F-35B has a lift fan in the forward fuselage. still, im sure BAE will come up with somthing spectacular once the F-35 goes after service. i only wanted a QE class carrier to go with the IRIS JSF. VTOL landing is great fun, the ronald reagan is too big, and the cruisers are too small. ive got abacus carrier stirke force, but the animated deck planes on HMS Invincible are rubbish, they look like crap and get in the way. plus all the harriers i have downloaded have some kind of issue, most dont handle in a way that they can actually be controlled with the nozzles down
Last edited by dienkonig on Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
dienkonig
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:36 am

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby Harold » Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:11 pm

I can't find the Elizabeth class there yet, but you might want to check fs-shipyards.com.

If anything ... I think it would be better to ask over there ;)
User avatar
Harold
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5906
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:13 am
Location: NL

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby Brando14100 » Thu Nov 06, 2008 5:45 pm

I don't know why, but everytime I see the ramp on the front of that carrier I want to just laugh. It just looks kinda silly, I guess. Mabey it's just me.

:D

8-)
Brando14100
 

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby ShaneG_old » Thu Nov 06, 2008 6:41 pm

I used to think the same thing, until I seen a video of Su-37's jumping off of one on a Russian carrier. :o Totally changed my mind. Now I think the US navy has it wrong with the steam catapults. At least with the ramps, you don't have to worry about mechanical failure preventing an aircraft from launching. ;)
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby Brando14100 » Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:20 pm

I've seen planes launch from them before. I still think it looks a little silly, almost cartoonish I guess. I don't know. I guess it doesn't look any sillier than a US pilot's expression when he goes off the catapult.
Last edited by Brando14100 on Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brando14100
 

Re: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier (for Accel)

Postby ShaneG_old » Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:35 pm

;D ;D ;D Permission denied, the pants are full! ;D ;D
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am


Return to Other Add-ons Wanted

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 289 guests