Not bad going really!

Ideas, suggestions, tips & questions on how to supercharge your PC or software!

Not bad going really!

Postby GeForce » Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:13 am

Well these SD3700 chips certainly clock well: ;D

Image

Stock voltage and stock cooling. And stable 8)

Very pleased :)

Jon 8)
Image
LiveScripts.NET - Over 300 free Scripts and Extensive Scripting Tutorials
AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 2.8G
User avatar
GeForce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:20 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby NicksFXHouse » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:23 am

Well these SD3700 chips certainly clock well: ;D

Image

Stock voltage and stock cooling. And stable 8)

Very pleased :)

Jon 8)


Yep... used that processor for almost a year with the same 25% overclock
NicksFXHouse
 

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby congo » Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:00 pm

That's why I raved on about the San Diego until I got sick of my own voice. Excellent CPU.
Last edited by congo on Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby ctjoyce » Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:25 pm

Ever wonder why we are always suggesting the 3700+ San Deago?

Cheers
Cameron
CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003
Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII
[b]Vesp
User avatar
ctjoyce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: USA

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby GeForce » Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:38 am

Ever wonder why we are always suggesting the 3700+ San Deago?


Now I know ;D ;D

Jon 8)
Image
LiveScripts.NET - Over 300 free Scripts and Extensive Scripting Tutorials
AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 2.8G
User avatar
GeForce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:20 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby Brett_Henderson » Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:55 pm

I got mine right up there too (Congo was very patient with me (thanks again)).. It was cool and stable enough for everything.. Ran FS9 great.. EXCEPT.. Day of Defeat would crash until I slowed it down just a tad.

I think I could have worked with the memory a little (or got better memory).. but the difference in speed wasn't that much..

I'll have to check, but I think it ended up being a 20% O/C.. Very noticeable in FS9   ;D
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby NicksFXHouse » Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:28 pm

[quote]I got mine right up there too (Congo was very patient with me (thanks again)).. It was cool and stable enough for everything.. Ran FS9 got better memory).. but the difference in speed wasn't that much..

I'll have to check, but I think it ended up being a 20% O/C.. Very noticeable in FS9
NicksFXHouse
 

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby GeForce » Fri Jul 21, 2006 1:06 am

It does rather depend on the stepping. Over on the OCUK forums some people have been hitting 3Ghz on air with the newest chips.

However, some of them can only manage 2.6Ghz @ 1.5v, so it really is luck of the draw.

Jon 8)
Image
LiveScripts.NET - Over 300 free Scripts and Extensive Scripting Tutorials
AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 2.8G
User avatar
GeForce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:20 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Re: Not bad going really!

Postby congo » Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:51 am

Stability tests don't always work to guarantee stability at a particular clockspeed either. I'm beginning to believe that some gaming apps may have bad code that trips the CPU into a failure where it would normally test stable.

I get failures in IL2FB and NFS Most Wanted at high clockspeeds and intense game periods with maximum action, yet torture testing shows the CPU is stable. I'm also not ruling out memory as a possible culprit either, I just haven't got the knowledge to be absolutely certain of the cause.

In any event, Backing off the clock slightly usually cures the problem, though Need For Speed - Most Wanted requires that I go back to 2.6ghz or I get a crash after a fairly long session.

There is what is termed "errata" built into every CPU, these are documented design errors which have been identified. It's possible that all errata is not documented and therefore software developers may risk putting "hits" on those errata which could cause a crash.

Another explanation is just sloppy programming or perhaps a missed error when the program was compiled.

I'm not qualified in these areas, I'm simply explaining things the way I understand them.

Whether or not clockspeed could be a factor in these "software" crashes is something I'm not certain of, but I do suspect it's a possibility.
Last edited by congo on Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia


Return to Tweaking & Overclocking

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests