Thanks Nick N,
This has got to be worth a sticky methinks!
Good info.

Your welcome!
With the older Athlon/Duron/Sempron the system divider can have a negative effect on performance. With the A64, the divider has no effect on performance and will allow the user to significantly enhance the system.
It was easier in terms of testing time to overclock the older processors mainly because the overclock was relative to all components. With the A64 it requires overclocking each system (CPU/Memory) independantly, testing settings for hours, then calculating the final overclock values and testing again. The results far exceed the Athlon of the past since it is not unusual to gain 600mhz+ on a A64 CPU, ESPECIALLY the San Diego core. If you max out the vcore and use extreame cooling... an OC of 800mhz+ is very possible.
A64 systems respond to the 1T CMD memory setting with close to TWICE the performance gain of previous processors. That is why it is best to either select memory rated for 1T-CMD or set the 1T-CMD and work out the memory timing/FSB/vdd based on that being enabled, even if the memory is not 1T rated.
I do alot of video editing and use 2 1G sticks of OCZ 2.0-3-2-5: 2T memory rated at 2.5v. By raising CAS to 2.5 and running 3-3-8 (or 11) with a vdd of 2.7v and the divider of 5:3 (DDR333) I can run the 1T-CMD stable up to 260FSB CPU with a Vcore of 1.65v (216mhz memory), which nets over 7000 in memory scores. When I push the system like that I drop hypertransport in the BIOS to 600mhz, which nets an HTT overclocked rating of around 845mhz.
With that overclock I am well over $1000 dollar FX57 performance using a $245.00 CPU.
The reduced 845mhz OC/HTT will not have any negative influence on performance, at all.
1000 is the target value you do not want to go over but as long as it is over 700-800 and the rest of the system is correctly overclocked... your system is smokin!!!!!!!!
Last edited by NicksFXHouse on Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.