A very good FSX machine can be built for under $2500US..
......A very good FSX machine can be built for under $2500US....
Well, im going to go with FS9, it was a hard choice because ive played both but the reason why im picking FS9 is because, you don't need a super computer to run it on. Second, because its possible to get all the Ground Crew, Fuel tanks, Jetways ect ect, by addons, i have thousands of addons, to make FS9 "better" and it can still be improved, im hopfully getting a new computer soon, so when i do, my graphics will be much better and textures improved, the only thing that let it down for me was, Space Flight which in FSX is possible, but other than that i think FS2004 is better.
I'm sorry, but I get the feeling that MS has made FSX into more of a game rather than an actual sim...Do we really need missions in FSX? Fine, the cars and all are good looking, but rather pointless to me...I'd rather spend time up in the air than on the ground...I'm not saying FSX is useless...I do understand that's it's better than FS9 by leaps and bounds, but to me, the actual Simulator died out with FS9...I don't want my simulator to be a "game"...![]()
A very good FSX machine can be built for under $2500US..
Sorry.. I don't check this section of the forums often... Someone bumped it up so I'm late responding.
Yes, $2,500 is alot of money, but it's about average for a new gaming computer.
Heck.. I paid $4,000 for an IBM PC back in 1981. It was 0.004GHZ / 0.0005GB of RAM / 0.01GB HDD..
Circa 1996, a Monster Gaming computer ( 233MHZ / 64MB of RAM / 16MB Voodoo V-card ) was a good $4,000, too..
Return to Computer Games & Software
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 210 guests