Print view
Board index ‹ Computer Hardware & Software Forum ‹ Computer Games & Software

Which Combat FS is better?

PC Software. Anything to do with PC Games & software!
Post a reply

Which Combat FS is better?

Postby cspyro21 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:33 pm

Hi all,
  I am thinking of getting one of the above mentioned in the poll, and I wanted to ask you which s better? I thought a poll would be a good idea.  ;D ;D
Cheers
User avatar
cspyro21
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:11 am
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:45 pm

LOMAC most definately...self-shadowing models and all....very nice it is...but very hard too ;)
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby Mobius » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:26 pm

Gonna have to say LOMAC because of all the different things you can do, and different systems there are and also the fact that they are currently making another add-on that lets you fly Helocopters and maybe the F-16 soon, but I'm not so sure.
Image
User avatar
Mobius
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby cspyro21 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:26 pm

LOMAC most definately...self-shadowing models and all....very nice it is...but very hard too


Ok, but I suppose harder = better, as it would be more realistic, yes?

I'd have to say Lomac


Seems Lomac is the more popular game, and it sounds like the addons would be good!
Last edited by cspyro21 on Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
cspyro21
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:11 am
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:27 pm

I'm gonna say strike fighters cause as far as I know it actually works. Unlike what i've heard about Lomac...
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:32 pm


Ok, but I suppose harder = better, as it would be more realistic, yes?


Seems to be the case most of the time...FS is pretty hard with all realism set to hard...so I would say so 8)
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby flyboy 28 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:16 pm

Strike Fighters multiplied by like, 20 bajillion thousand.

It's way more stable, way more fun, and way more customizeable.
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby denishc » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:24 pm

 Is Strike Fighters still available?  I still see plenty of copies LOMAC on the shelves but haven't seen Strike Fighters around since it first came out.
denishc
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 5:01 pm
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby flyboy 28 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:13 pm

www.amazon.com

www.ebay.com

www.ebgames.com
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby Mobius » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:21 pm

I'm gonna say strike fighters cause as far as I know it actually works. Unlike what i've heard about Lomac...



If you get LOMAC and Flaming Cliffs, everything runs nice and smooth.  I've had it since May or June and never had a problem.  

The difficulty is scalable also, you can set easy radar and things like that so it leans more toward the arcade side if you want it to.

I can't say anything about Stirke Fighters though, I haven't tried it, though it does seem to be a bit more customizable.

Also, it depends on what you want to fly.  Strike Fighters is Vietnam era (i.e. F-4, etc..., although you might be able to get add-ons) and LOMAC is more Modern Day to near future (F-15, A-10, MiG-29, etc...).
Image
User avatar
Mobius
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby flyboy 28 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:31 pm

you might be able to get add-ons


www.combatace.com
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10264
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby Ecko » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:49 pm

Were missing IL-2!!! Unless you mean the best, of just those two. IL-2 is by far the best Combat flight simulator in my opinion.
Image
User avatar
Ecko
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3684
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: Denmark
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby cspyro21 » Tue Sep 27, 2005 1:38 am

Were missing IL-2!!! Unless you mean the best, of just those two. IL-2 is by far the best Combat flight simulator in my opinion.


I just wanted to see which was the better two, but I have heard very good things about IL-2. Is it any good?
User avatar
cspyro21
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:11 am
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby ATI_7500 » Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:02 am

Strike Fighters all the way.
ATI_7500
 
Top

Re: Which Combat FS is better?

Postby || Andy || » Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:04 am

No contest Lomac.. Hands Down..


::)

;D
|| Andy ||
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2613
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:55 am
Location: Shropshire, United Kingdom
Top
Next
Post a reply

Return to Computer Games & Software

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 686 guests