939 vs AM2

Graphics Cards, Sound Cards, Joysticks, Computers, etc. Ask or advise here!

939 vs AM2

Postby imchief » Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:18 pm

I have been out of the loop for a while and noticed that there is a new socket type for AMD.  I currently run a 939 64 but was going to upgrade soon to be able to run FSX.  I know i need to get a dual core but the newest type aren't 939s.  The fastest i've seen is a fx 4600 i think.  What would be the best choice for my current MB.  Obviously I need to upgrade VC but that is not an issue to me.  Here are my specs:

MB: ASUS a8n-e 939 NF4
CPU:  AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice core
VC: Lead tek GF PCX6600gt 128
RAM: 1gb Rosewill pc3200 in dual channel

I want to run FSX so that i notice all of the new features and still have acceptable frames.

Thanks in adcance
The PC Specs- Antec SLK 3700 - Asus A8n-E NF4 Ultra Dual Channel - AMD Athlon 64 3700 939 Sandy E6 Core - Western Digital Cavair SE WD800JD 80GB & 250GB HDD - 2GB GSkill PC3200 - Sparkle P790 512MB 7900GT - Zalman 9500A
imchief
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 3:58 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby congo » Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:51 pm

going to upgrade soon to be able to run FSX.


;D
Last edited by congo on Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby imchief » Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:01 pm

Thanks Congo.  That is good to hear.   I will probably contact you for some OC advice but i will definitely have to get better cooling than stock.  I have been very happy with my system so if I can get FSX to work fairly well that would be great.    
The PC Specs- Antec SLK 3700 - Asus A8n-E NF4 Ultra Dual Channel - AMD Athlon 64 3700 939 Sandy E6 Core - Western Digital Cavair SE WD800JD 80GB & 250GB HDD - 2GB GSkill PC3200 - Sparkle P790 512MB 7900GT - Zalman 9500A
imchief
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 3:58 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby congo » Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:03 pm

I get 2.75ghz on my stock cooler, but my cpu may be exceptional in that regard, google up images of the Zalman 9500 and see what you think.

I would just start with the overclock on stock cooler, your cpu may not want to go much higher at all, so you don't want to waste money on a cooler if that's the case.

You can go into bios and in advanced settings, go into cpu configuration and set dram frequency to DDR333 (or 166mhz), and HT multiplier to 4x.

Go back to advanced and scroll down to jumperfree configuration and set overclock options to manual.

Set cpu frequency to 250mhz, set cpu multiplier to 9 for 2250 mhz or 10 for 2500ghz cpu speed.

lock PCIe bus to 100mhz
Last edited by congo on Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby GeForce » Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:21 am

I get 2.75ghz on my stock cooler, but my cpu may be exceptional in that regard


2.8Ghz on stock cooler here. The 3700s were always known for their overclockability ;)

Jon 8-)
Image
LiveScripts.NET - Over 300 free Scripts and Extensive Scripting Tutorials
AMD Athlon 64 3700+ @ 2.8G
User avatar
GeForce
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 4:20 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby rootbeer » Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:46 pm

What about my 3800+?
emachines T6212; AMD Athlon64 3800+ (2.40 GHz; Venice core); Allied AL-B500E 500W power supply; 2048Mb PC3200 DDR400; Westinghouse LCM-22w2 wide-screen LCD monitor; eVGA e-GeForce 7900 GS KO X16 PCIe video card; Logitech Extreme 3D Pro flight controller;<
User avatar
rootbeer
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 846
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:50 pm
Location: Fernley, Nevada

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby congo » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:13 pm

Probably not Rootbeer.

Depends on the mainboard emachines gave you but don't get your hopes up.

By the way, if  I knew that information, I'd know more about your system than you or your signature could tell me.
Last edited by congo on Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby Boca » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:26 am

I've only got an AMD64 3500+  with stock cooler on this board..  http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/2005/09/16/asrock_939dual/
and word round the campfire is, it's not a good overclocker.  :'(

And I actually laughed out loud when I googled that Zalman 9500.  ;D  Your case must be the size of an aircraft hanger.  ;D
User avatar
Boca
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Scotland

Re: 939 vs AM2

Postby legoalex2000 » Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:05 am

LOL!! i got a 9700 to cool a +3200 which had taken its baby steps to overclock. until i get better ram my O/C is limited, but i hear that the 3200 has got some poer behind it. congo you'll have to teach me a trick or too.

and the zalman 9700 isn't THAT big, it clears my mid size wall by 1.2 inches.

[smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif]Ramos
legoalex2000
 


Return to Hardware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 429 guests