by rootbeer » Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:33 pm
Roger; wilco.
I did a search and found several reviews for the X800GTO. Because all the numbers they use in these benchmark tests mean absolutely nothing to me, most of it fell on deaf ears, but I did notice in one test the X800GTO generated 20623 widgets (assumably per second or clock cycle or something) while my card, the X700Pro, generated only 18630-- a difference of 1993 widgets, or an increase of 10.7% to the better for the X800. Is less than 11% improvement in a test that I understand not what is measured worth dropping $400? I'm not sure.
My problem is that should I buy one of these new, bigger, better cards, I will be sorely disappointed when my machine boots up (after its three-minute boot cycle) and gives me a screen that says the video card cannot be recognized and would I please take the machine to a tech shop and have them tell me that I must put the old card back in if I want any video at all and please write a check to the nice man for $60 an hour. Thank you.
I'm sorry, but I have become so disillusioned in my old age...
I forgot to add, I saw one card being manufactured/assembled/marketed(?) by GeCube and the other by HIS. Are these the same card made by different companies? Who is ATI, then?
I went to eBay and looked at the X800GTO card. There seems to be several variations of it. I see Viper, Sapphire, Diamond Sapphire, Diamond Viper, Sapphire Viper, Viper Sapphire and a few others I can't now remember. I'm flummoxed. Who is responsible? What is George Bush doing about this?
Last edited by
rootbeer on Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
emachines T6212; AMD Athlon64 3800+ (2.40 GHz; Venice core); Allied AL-B500E 500W power supply; 2048Mb PC3200 DDR400; Westinghouse LCM-22w2 wide-screen LCD monitor; eVGA e-GeForce 7900 GS KO X16 PCIe video card; Logitech Extreme 3D Pro flight controller;<