by congo » Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:11 pm
I use a 6600GT and it's quite powerful in comparson to a 9600XT.
What I do is set my graphics quality in the driver settings manually and globally, everything gets displayed at the same high quality, I don't use profiles.
When you install nVidia drivers, some automated programs are enabled in the startup and a new service is activated. I disable these and remove the service.
Once that is done I right click the desktop, go to properties/settings/advanced and then click on the 6600GT tab. Make sure the profile is set to global driver settings and choose "Advanced Settings" in the view box.
Experiment with the AA and AF filtering settings to obtain the best quality/FPS ratio that suits you, (I use 2 or 4x AA and 8 or 16x AF and set "Image Settings" to the highest quality with the slider. Everything else I leave at default. No doubt some applications will benefit with custom profiles, but I find the above settings work well with all my 3D programs.
Palit and Expertvision are the same company I believe and I've read good and bad about them. I've never owned one and have had reservations about ordering them on a couple of occasions as they often appear at an attractive price point in the marketplace. One lesson that I've learned over the years is that a "cheap" video card needs to be treated with suspicion.
Another thing is that your card has 256mb of ram fitted, and this immediately gets my shackles up because the card is usually fitted with 128mb of onboard ram.
With video cards, more ram sets off alarm bells, particularly if the card is cheap, because the quality of the additional ram is invariably inferior. If a video card has more ram it should definitely be higher priced than the "standard" version, or you should assume the card has inferior ram fitted unless specs show otherwise.
I'm not saying your card is inferior, I'm just very suspicious of it because of the added ram..... it may be quite a decent card after all. The ram chips fitted to the card have a latency figure in their specification that determines the quality. The lower the latency, the better the quality. This takes a bit of research to sort out what you have and it's relative performance in the scheme of things. Typically, manufacturers will use different ram chips on the same model card due to availability. Also, the suppliers of that ram may label "better" chips as lesser quality if they are getting a high yield of quality chips at that period in their production process. So, it's possible that a card with a lesser ram specification may in fact be able to run a bit faster.
Another thing that determines video card performance is the clock speeds set by the manufacturer through the card's bios. If a video card has slower clock settings than it's near competitor's cards, chances are they slowed the card down because of performance issues.
I haven't researched many video cards in detail lately. I'm just making you aware of the fact that there are several little known considerations when it comes to video card selection. Another safeguard is the 6600GT standard requires certain performance criteria be met before the card is certified as a 6600GT and able to use the name legally under license from nVidia. So, at worst, it should still perform as good as the base 6600GT standard.
Last edited by
congo on Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&