Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Graphics Cards, Sound Cards, Joysticks, Computers, etc. Ask or advise here!

Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby alrot » Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:55 pm

Just I wonder wich is the best Intel Or AMD  ;)
Image

Venezuela
User avatar
alrot
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8961
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:47 am

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby congo » Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:24 am

I have both, they are good.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby Gunny04 » Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:12 am

From my expierence With many Home Intels and 1 AMD Athlon, Schools with macs, etc....... I have to say my 1 AMD Athlon is much better for what I do than any of my Intels! Cheers, Gunny
AMD athlon 3800 Venice Socket 939 64 bit at 2.4Ghz, 6100K8MA-RS Foxconn Motherboard, 1gb (2X512) OCZ Platinum PC3200 Ram, EVGA 8800GTS 640MB OC, 500 Watt NZXT psu, and Windows Vista Ultimate Total hard drive space 530gb
Gunny04
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2059
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby Skligmund » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:12 am

Currently, I am running 4 AMD's (actually on and doing stuff) in my place right now. I have a 5th not turned on.

1: *See specs below*
2: Athlon64 3000+ (2200 MHz on stock air/voltages)
3: AthlonXP 2100+ (2400 MHz on water)
4: K6-2+ 400 (400 MHz in notebook)
5: K6-III+ 400 (600 MHz on stock air/voltages) This one is not used, but is available.

Processors owned in chronological order:

1: 286 **
2: 386 SX **
3: 486 DX33 **
4: 486 DX66 **
5: Pentium 75 **
6: Pentium 100 **
7: Pentium 120 **
8: Pentium 166 mmx **
9: Pentium II 450
Last edited by Skligmund on Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
Athlon64 3700+ San Diego (2200) @ 2750 MHz
1024MB PC3200 @ 500 MHz (Mushkin V2)
GeForce 6800GT OC (BFG)
(2) 80G SATA Seagates RAID0
(1) Maxtor 250Gb 16MB Cache ATA133
19
User avatar
Skligmund
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 2:09 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby town » Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:47 am

I think AMD are the better choice for gamers and intel better for work stuff.
Image

Shop at SKYSIM.CO.UK
User avatar
town
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: Harrogate, North Yorkshire

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby Skligmund » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:13 am

I think AMD are the better choice for gamers and intel better for work stuff.


Last generation, this was true. When AMD came out with the A64, AMD was superior in EVERY respect except for coding with software designed for Intel. Even then, it was very close. Power consumption is also lower with AMD. I turn you to www.tomshardware.com , where they go into depth on every article they write. Very good information, unbiased.
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
Athlon64 3700+ San Diego (2200) @ 2750 MHz
1024MB PC3200 @ 500 MHz (Mushkin V2)
GeForce 6800GT OC (BFG)
(2) 80G SATA Seagates RAID0
(1) Maxtor 250Gb 16MB Cache ATA133
19
User avatar
Skligmund
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 2:09 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby legoalex2000 » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:29 am

i've owned 4 intels and 1 AMD, and i would never go back (well cant say that to my pentium II sitting next to my feet as a backup comp)

AMD is better in gaming, i can agree, and in coooling, i have noticed reduced power consumption, even when overclocked. microsoft released XP x64 for AMD only, so even they are making AMD a better choice for people. thats a risky move, cause intel could pull the plug, and focus on the Core Duo for mac.

whew... AMD it is!

:)Ramos
legoalex2000
 

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby alrot » Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:16 pm

And cheaper Though.. ;)
Image

Venezuela
User avatar
alrot
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8961
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:47 am

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby kipman725 » Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:16 pm

CPU's I have owned (some of the 486's missed out due to having about 40!)

486 sx25
486 sx33
466 dx66
486 dx80
*all intell so far*
586 IBM chip (fitted 486 soccett) 100mhz
Cyrix 486 120mhz chip (went like a rocket ship)

Intell pentium 2 200mhz
Intell pentium 2 233mhz
Intell pentium 2 266mhz
Intell pentium 2 400mhz
Amd k6-2 233mhz
Amd K6-2 300mhz
Amd k6-2 333mhz
Amd k6-2 400mhz
Amd k6-2 550mhz (think this is fastest on this platform)

Amd Duron 800mhz

I have alot of p3 chips that I have been given but the mobos are all OEM boards and are HORIBLE and don't work.  Which is probs why they were thrown out and I haven't had chance to test them, If anyone sees a sweet p3 board on ebay then drop me a pm.

Athlon 1800
Athlon 2500
Athlon 2600
Athlon 2800

Basicly I built most of the computers long after the tech had gone out of date as I used to be too young to even have a paper round when I started building pcs at the age of 9-10 and so had to get my dad to buy old 486's from ebay on a budget of
5900xt/2800+/280GB/1GB PC3200/Cyborg Evo Force/ABIT NF7
Gpu clock: 475mhz core, 800mhz mem
CPU at: 12.5x175 = 2187.5
memory: 2.5, 3, 3, 8 Duel channel on
Os: windows xp pro, ubuntu 5.10 breazy badger
User avatar
kipman725
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:11 pm
Location: Bedroom

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby kipman725 » Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:19 pm


Very good information, unbiased.


I disagree THG is just very subtle you have to be very carefull, I'm not sure of their angle but they have been known to draw graph scales in favor of certian hardware (so it apears that on one benchmark a component has a huge lead when it dosen't and on another it lost the scale makes it look like a very small loss).  Look it up on discussion boards.
5900xt/2800+/280GB/1GB PC3200/Cyborg Evo Force/ABIT NF7
Gpu clock: 475mhz core, 800mhz mem
CPU at: 12.5x175 = 2187.5
memory: 2.5, 3, 3, 8 Duel channel on
Os: windows xp pro, ubuntu 5.10 breazy badger
User avatar
kipman725
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:11 pm
Location: Bedroom

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby Saitek » Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:00 pm

They say AMD for gaming. I have both, but due to the sytems all being different I can't fairly compare.
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FS
Saitek
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby Skligmund » Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:34 pm

[quote]

I disagree THG is just very subtle you have to be very carefull, I'm not sure of their angle but they have been known to draw graph scales in favor of certian hardware (so it apears that on one benchmark a component has a huge lead when it dosen't and on another it lost the scale makes it look like a very small loss).
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
Athlon64 3700+ San Diego (2200) @ 2750 MHz
1024MB PC3200 @ 500 MHz (Mushkin V2)
GeForce 6800GT OC (BFG)
(2) 80G SATA Seagates RAID0
(1) Maxtor 250Gb 16MB Cache ATA133
19
User avatar
Skligmund
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 2:09 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby Ivan » Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:05 am

AMD Athlon64. it's same or better for the same price
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby kipman725 » Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:03 am



If anything, they are biased for Intel. The way they draw their graphs is usually by release date if the numbers are the same. You'll also find they use averages a lot. The way they make their graphs is as biased as when you benchmark with SiSoft SANDRA. Look at the difference between the P4 and the AthlonXP in benchmarks. How do they decide what factor rates one higher than the other?

There may be the occasion biased opinion of the writer, but the writer usually tells you it is his opinion. The information they present is true, use it wisely.



Despite the bias there is some veyr good info on there site aswell such as the psu testing (not many sites test to destruction).  Just keep your sceptic hat on  ;)
5900xt/2800+/280GB/1GB PC3200/Cyborg Evo Force/ABIT NF7
Gpu clock: 475mhz core, 800mhz mem
CPU at: 12.5x175 = 2187.5
memory: 2.5, 3, 3, 8 Duel channel on
Os: windows xp pro, ubuntu 5.10 breazy badger
User avatar
kipman725
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:11 pm
Location: Bedroom

Re: Athlon64 or Pentium 4

Postby congo » Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:11 am

..........www.tomshardware.com , where they go into depth on every article they write. Very good information, unbiased.



You reckon?
Last edited by congo on Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Next

Return to Hardware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 479 guests