by congo » Sat Apr 03, 2004 5:55 pm
Well I think the question is worthy of an answer, so I'll answer myself.
RAM itself is not really a "graphics" solution. Extra RAM will only help, (in varying degrees, depending on configuration), if the system is starving for RAM....which was part of your problem.
I like to use the analogy- enough room to swing a cat-...
The CPU needs working space to carry out it's job. Put it in a closet with no RAM- it doesn't have swinging room.
Give it plenty of RAM, it's free to swing that cat around the front yard on a string!
Put excess RAM in the PC.... You can only swing a cat so far...... The CPU becomes the limiting factor, it can't process enough data to use all the available RAM.
Graphics Performance POTENTIAL is determined by the Graphics Engine (graphics processing unit or GPU).
The more powerful the GPU, the more potential for good graphics. Thus, a video card's performance is primarily identified by it's GPU genre. ie. FX5700, Radeon 9600XT.
Those numbers represent the "class" of the GPU. Many variations often occur within the class, such as the amount and type of RAM onboard the video card.
Graphics Performance always stops somewhere...... a limiting factor, whether it be the CPU, RAM, GPU, bandwidth limitations or the software itself.
Identifying the limiting factor, or determining the most critical bottleneck, requires:
1. enough facts about the system to make an informed analysis, and
2. sufficient understanding of gaining the most POTENTIAL out of a particular hardware setup.
The solution can then be passed on to the poor soul who, when he/she bought the machine, said "That's Pretty!"
Last edited by
congo on Sat Apr 03, 2004 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&