by congo » Sat Sep 20, 2003 12:27 pm
If you are set on a budget AMD system, then grab a mainboard with an nForce2 chipset that supports a 400mhz Front Side Bus speed, in case you want to upgrade the CPU later. The brand is up to you. I chose a Soltek SL75FRN2 and am very happy with it.
When you purchase a mainboard with the nForce2 chipset, make sure it doesn't have the onboard graphics chip unless you specifically want it, as they are a bit slower even if you install an addon card into the AGP slot provided as well.
(these boards can apparently provide onboard graphics similar to a GF4 MX 440 addon card)
As far as the CPU goes, just get the best bang for buck in your price bracket. I bought a XP2600+ because it was cheap at the time. It is actually faster than the Barton chips around that speed and overclocks a little with no hassles.
Win XP is a lot more stable than Win '98. I've been happy using it in a dual boot system along with '98 for over a year. I won't install '98 again, I dont use it anymore. The following is why.
Scania's fix for RAM limit on win '98 eludes me.
The upper RAM limit in the setting he refers to above is 999mb. This is short of the two 512 DDR sticks I have installed.
This means that everytime I want to run Win '98, I have to remove 512mb of RAM out of my box. Not really the done thing, eh?
However, a 512mb stick, plus a 256mb stick of RAM work fine in Win '98.
BUT! The new chipsets run DDR RAM in Dual Channel mode, meaning you need two RAM sticks that are pretty much identical, to take advantage of the potential increase in memory bandwidth that the new systems are capable of.
This basically means you are going to buy 2 quality sticks of RAM, either 2 x 256mb or 2 x 512mb. The 1024mb option is really the way to go, considering the recent developements in software, the current price of RAM, and the lifespan of your new rig.
So, XP is a good idea. You can configure it (as I have) to look and behave almost identical to Win '98 without the crashes '98 is prone to.
While on the subject of RAM and an AMD based system, you might like to know that if you use an AMD CPU that runs at 333mhz (166mhz DDR) such as many do, then PC2700 (333mhz ram) will actually perform faster than PC3200 (400mhz ram). The reason is that the system has to convert the faster ram back by an algorithm which uses more speed than any advantage gained by the faster RAM.
So......... Match your Mainboard FSB speed, CPU speed and RAM speed. If it's AMD based, this will be ALL either 333mhz or 400mhz in a modern system. If the system is matched up like this, It will run very quick indeed.
Have fun!

Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&