This Friday (16th) sees the 60th anniversary of the famous Dambusters Raid. I've long been fascinated by that 617 Sqd. mission and thanks to the "Dambusters" add-on for CFS2 and a recent TV documentary my admiration for the flying skills involved has increased enormously.
This set me wondering what other type of weapon they could have used, assuming Barnes Wallis never came up with the 'bouncing bomb' idea. The concept I came up with is what you might call a rocket-propelled, wire-guided, aerial torpedo, having visual similarities to the German V-1 Flying Bomb.
The idea is that this device would be released at low level - though not nearly as low as the actual mission - say 200ft or so, and at a greater distance from the dam: maybe 1/2 mile. This would allow the weapon to clear the aircraft safely before the rocket(s) would ignite. As the device overtook its carrier aircraft it would unreel a guidance wire attached to its tail from the bomb-bay, through which steering commands would be sent electrically by the bomb-aimer. It could thus be skimmed over the dam's anti-torpedo nets, entering the water to act as a 'conventional' torpedo, or aimed directly at the structure's water-line. Once several devices had been placed like this, they could all be detonated simultaneously by radio-wave for maximum explosive effect.
Now, this is where you guys come in. The tools exist out there with which to create such a (simulated) weapon, marry it up with the "Dambusters" add-on, and see if the flamin' thing would have actually worked (all based on 1940's technology of course). Unfortunately, I don't have the computer skills to do this myself, but I'm wondering if some of you other 617/Dambusters fans might be up to the job and keen enough to give it a try? I think it would make for an interesting - and challenging - excercise. Whaddaya think? Any takers?

Chocks away!
Paddy Payne 8)
Thought For Today: If bombs were meant to bounce they'd be made of rubber.