FLAT!The UK?
Modlerbob, you're both right, and wrong.
The US has a staggering variety of scenic areas. But the rest of the world was short changed to one degree or another.
Back when MS developed FSX, 2006, computers were generally slower than they are now.
Another limitation was the hard disk size back then. A whole lot of people still had 500MB, and smaller drives.
In other words, MS was pushing it as it was.
And a lot of people were gripping about the requirements at the time.Added to that, MS had to decide when enough was enough. When was FSX good enough to start selling.
So they decided to do it this way - The US has the better mesh
(elevation detail), followed by much of Europe. South America, and Asia, got the short end of the stick.
And most small islands
(with a few exceptions) got the shaft.
As Mr Frozzer states, get a good world wide mesh.
I use
FSGenesis - World Terrain Mesh. It may not be the best, but it's by
FAR the cheapest
GOOD mesh.
FSGlobal vs. FSGenesisAnd if you want to try other areas of the world, a good mesh should be the first add-on that you buy.
And in so far as FSGlobal being slightly better than FSGenesis it's a moot point. The sceneries that I download usually have better meshes
(and sometimes MUCH better meshes than FSGlobal).
FTX: Global, although expensive, helps to make the scenery that you fly over look more believable.
Note the choice of words. Believable vs photorealistic.
On top of that,
FTX: Global was developed to fit the world area that you're flying over. IE - It'll be different flying over the USA, Asia, Africa, or South America.
On second thought, Paul You're right, "England" is relatively flat.
Flat but quite pleasant to fly over.

And if you go outside of England, you have places such Cairngorms in Scootland.


True. Not the Rockies. But enjoyable flying none the less.
Here are a couple of shots from one of my favorite islands - Madeira.


The US does have great areas. but there are other great areas too.