
http://web.orange.co.uk/article/quirkie ... on_pancake
Me?....
I would eat the Pancake, and put Karen Hendrickson in the Freezer...

Paul....



H wrote:What, pray tell, would the easterner Batman (since the term seems to reference the caped crusader of Gotham City, itself usually referenced to New York City) have to do with it? Also, Mr. Fosbery, I must contend with the fruitcake reference since there was no mention of fruit in the batter and, although you may believe otherwise, the subject is the pancake that was in the pan and not the waitress. Howsoever, although it would be moot, I must admit I could not properly refute your questioning of the grass that was used to produce the flower that has been making those pancakes -- nor the effects rendered upon those who may have partaken (we thought you more cautious of what you may be willing to eat, Mr. Fosbery).8)
Steve M wrote:You never know what's going to happen next at the Cowgirl Cafe. I'm seeing a bit of Frank Zappa on that hotcake.
Actually, I'd meant to type flour, rather than flower, although the topic may have wandered my subconscious to the hair adornments of 1960s San Francisco...Fozzer wrote:I had a read through your response, (twice), and I'm afraid I couldn't see the wood for the trees!
Perhaps not a precise answer to your query: the National Arbor Day city is actually Nebraska City, Nebraska. Many moons ago, in the earlier part of the 20th century, our federal gov't came up with the idea to pay midwestern farmers (of the treeless plains) to plant trees. They have what they call bluffs (I've said they're called bluffs because they can only pretend to be hills) and very few trees to stop the wind from blowing through.Fozzer wrote:Which reminds me...
..in your corner of the Globe...
The residents of NH are experiencing similar problems...>>> http://concord-nh.patch.com/groups/poli ... rticipants
A New Hampshire "Treety"......!
Yes, Foz -- and our capitol, Concord, was originally named Rumford; many other towns bear names of which you'd be familiar.Fozzer wrote:(Is "Old" Hampshire in England?)......!
Even NH would take a large chunk out of your big island and the population in colonial days was much less per area than it was where you are, much less as compared to the population of today. I think the main reason horses never made an importance with Natives of this area was because foot paths were the main routes through the tree-covered rocky hills (a Nebraskan woman once posted a comment in a local paper about her visit to New England: she could tell there had been an ancient civilization in NE because of all the remains of rock walls along back roads and through the trees. What she was seeing were the lines of piled rock that had been pulled out of the ground when clearing for roads and clearings; one cleared another area so the first could be replenished and, if not recultivated soon, an area was reclaimed by forest).H wrote:Sadly, NH is down to @ 60% forest. Not all homes are wood and much of the construction material in those that are is now pressed wood, or sawdust, along with the long-used plywood; solid wood is quite expensive. Here in our northeast, the wigwams of my early Native American ancesters were actually a type of log cabin.Fozzer wrote:Ta for the reply, @H...
...always interesting...
Carrying on the subject of; "Trees"...
I am always surprised, that in certain places, there are any trees left, when everyone in the USA seems to build their houses, etc, entirely of wood, inside and outside!Fozzer wrote:The early settlers must have devastated the local countryside, (especially in desert areas), by cutting down all the trees to construct various buildings!
H wrote:As to devastating 'desert areas' in such a manner... how much energy did this hallucinating axeman have to be felling these imaginary trees?....
8)
Hagar wrote:Speaking of trees: During a railway journey from Washington DC to NYC in 1996 I remember remarking to my brother that I'd never seen so many trees in my life.
As I indicated by my previous response, much was, and is, imported. Neither was this all transported by rail, the railways built in earnest towards the latter part of the 19th and early 20th centuries. What seems overlooked here is the extensive use of adobe in the hotter, more barren landscapes.Fozzer wrote:In the many Hollywood Cowboy Films, years ago, filmed in the valley, showed a distinct lack of local trees anywhere, and yet whole towns were being built in the 19th Century, using trees: Bishop, Lone Pine, and Independence!
Films and Photographs of early settlers farms, show their property built entirely of wood, house, barns, etc, and yet there is hardly a tree to be seen anywhere in the dusty landscape!
In early Photographs of Southern California, Nevada, and Arizona, there always seems to be more wooden buildings there, than there are trees to support their building!
These States were very dry, dusty, tree-less landscapes.
Was the timber imported by the new Rail system, from forested areas, North Cal, Oregon, etc?
Paul... I like trees!......!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 575 guests