Call of Duty:World at War PC

[waspiflab]

[Dr.bob7]

I see the graphics on PC are a tad better than the graphics for wii... atleast online and gameplay for the wii rule

[machineman9]

Good choice of rifle in the first shot  ;) (My anti-sniper rifle in CoD3)

Rest are very nice shots too.

[a1]

This reminds me I have to take shots of the game too.


Great stuff there.  ;)

[waspiflab]

I see the graphics on PC are a tad better than the graphics for wii... atleast online and gameplay for the wii rule

more like 10x better looking than a wii online is MASSIVE for call of duty games on the pc

[Dr.bob7]

I see the graphics on PC are a tad better than the graphics for wii... atleast online and gameplay for the wii rule

more like 10x better looking than a wii online is MASSIVE for call of duty games on the pc

The wiis online is still towned down because the framerate is choppy on bigger maps and vehicels would lag it even more, but even with 9 maps it is still a very fun multiplayer experience

Edit: I still play CoD1 on the wii and it supports up to 64 players.... but thats a tad to much for me  ;)

[waspiflab]

I see the graphics on PC are a tad better than the graphics for wii... atleast online and gameplay for the wii rule

more like 10x better looking than a wii online is MASSIVE for call of duty games on the pc

The wiis online is still towned down because the framerate is choppy on bigger maps and vehicels would lag it even more, but even with 9 maps it is still a very fun multiplayer experience

Edit: I still play CoD1 on the wii and it supports up to 64 players.... but thats a tad to much for me

[Vuikag]

Best call of duty IMO, but alot of people disagree with me. (actually, UO was the best.)

think i'll post some MP pics later.

[J.]

CoD + UO was a legendary time, MP kept simple, it was fun, addictive and their was no gun stupidly powered! all balanced nicely!

they where the good old days.

nice shots, i have stayed clear of CoD5 mainly because the developers are pants on head retarded, and im hearing mixed reports of what its like but im still weary of it.

[Dr.bob7]

i do love CoD1 because no gun is better than the other.... where in the newer CoDs SMGs rule the day,


btw you should post some pics from Vendetta, best mission in my opinion

[firemonte007]

great looking shots...is this the game or the demo?...i've been looking for the demo but can't find it

[waspiflab]

great looking shots...is this the game or the demo?...i've been looking for the demo but can't find it

game

[J.]

well i borrowed this game from a friend who got it for christmas and ran through it in 5 hours.... and all i can think is....

WOW!!!!

what a complete step backwards from CoD4 (period obviously but i mean tech wise and gameplay) I see no huge improvements to graphics yet this is running worst! the AI is terrible, If i can be seen then all attention is on me, no matter how many team mates their are. You are the only one to ever be sat shooting, the only time your AI are with is moving between objectives (although saying that the AI when playing as russians works a bit better, but i suppose thats because your always just running down trenches etc etc..) Also the devs have so little imagination! the enemy at the gates rip off is just terrible!

i could go on for ever at how pants CoD5 is compared to CoD4 and how the devs of CoD5 should have their hands chopped off to stop them coding ever again!

but il stop the rant now

good things:

flamethrower is funny.......

bad thing of the good thing:

unlimited ammo for the flamethrower so you dont have to use it carefully, just hide for 10 secs and get another 20secs of flame. what BS!

[an-225]

While I agree with you about the gameplay, I guess the graphics are with good reason. Think about it, this CoD boasts WATER physics. And fire phyiscs. FSX doesn't have water physics, just landclass defining which area looks like water, reacts to wind (DX10) and will make your plane sink.

[J.]

While I agree with you about the gameplay, I guess the graphics are with good reason. Think about it, this CoD boasts WATER physics. And fire phyiscs. FSX doesn't have water physics, just landclass defining which area looks like water, reacts to wind (DX10) and will make your plane sink.

comparing the two is a really weird thing to do, considering both games work in a totaly differant way as you said and the way FSX works is to give maxiumum performance.

water physics in this game are not that spectacular, some ripples as they walk, the ocean doesnt look brilliant. meh all so mediocre.