For Doug...

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

For Doug...

Postby patchz » Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:37 pm

Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: For Doug...

Postby Flying Trucker » Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:02 pm

Thanks Larry...much appreciated... :)

That is the way I remember the 337D and the reason I asked for the pictures was one really had to monitor the engine guages and you flew by the numbers.

Many an aircraft was lost when the rear engine failed on takeoff as takeoff on one engine was not recommended.

The other thing I forgot to mention in your Center Line Thrust posting is the paint colour was the same colour that our 1963 Cessna 172 was... ;D
The livery was quite pleasing... :)

Again thanks for your time and pictures... ;)
Last edited by Flying Trucker on Wed Aug 03, 2011 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: For Doug...

Postby Jayhawk Jake » Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:32 pm

Thanks Larry...much appreciated... :)

That is the way I remember the 337D and the reason I asked for the pictures was one really had to monitor the engine guages and you flew by the numbers.

Many an aircraft was lost when the rear engine failed on takeoff as takeoff on one engine was not recommended.

The other thing I forgot to mention in your Center Line Thrust posting is the paint colour was the same colour that our 1963 Cessna 172 was... ;D
The livery was quite pleasing... :)

Again thanks for your time and pictures... ;)


I read in a book of lessons learned in aircraft design by the venerable Jan Roskam that one of the biggest problems with the 337 was the size of the landing gear bay doors.  When pilots would have an engine fail on take off, their reaction would be to raise the gear to reduce the drag on the aircraft.  However, the doors for the landing gear were so massive that doing so made too much drag and sometimes led to an accident.
Image
AMD Athalon X6 1090T 3.2Ghz::EVGA nVidia GeForce GTX 560Ti 2GB GDDR5::8GB RAM
*The opinions expressed above are my own and are in no way representative of fact or opinion of any ot
User avatar
Jayhawk Jake
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: For Doug...

Postby hyperpep111 » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:18 am

Nice Larry  8-)
Most people think that flying a plane is dangerous, except pilots because they know how easy it is.
Arguing with a pilot is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a while you begin to think the pig likes it.
User avatar
hyperpep111
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:02 pm
Location: 93 million miles from sun

Re: For Doug...

Postby Flying Trucker » Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:04 am

Hi Jake... :)

Without stealing Larry's thread to answer what you read is probably true.

When the first retractable gear Cessna 337s rolled off the line there was a problem with the gear and pilots had to pry it down with a bar...Cessna soon fixed that.

The 337 like a lot of aircraft was underpowered, maybe not the military version but the civilian aircraft was...

It also had a noisy interior, you were in a small cabin between two engines...

The rear engine sometimes would overheat and the aircraft just did not have enough power to takeoff on one engine and taking off on one engine was just not recommended.
That is why you had to monitor the engine guages because if the rear engine quit prior to getting into the air you had to act quickly.  With the front engine you could see the prop turning where as the rear engine you could not.
Not sure if someone added mirrors to the aircraft to watch the rear prop or not.

It was an expensive aircraft to maintain but if everything was working right you could ignore the noise with good headsets and the aircraft was a wonderful machine to fly, one of Cessna's best...

Only have heard of one being on floats and that was done here in Canada, do not know what ever came of the modification or the idea...
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm


Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 389 guests