HMMM...not sure...Part two

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Sat May 14, 2011 6:20 pm

Good evening all... :)

Have been doing a little experimenting with different settings during the same flight and conditions.

Not happy with the Frame Rate I see at all.

This computer is only used for FSX, loads of memory and kept cleaned up after every flight.

I think the Frame Rates should be much higher.
Last edited by Flying Trucker on Sat May 14, 2011 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby U4EA » Sun May 15, 2011 1:02 am

I find that sometimes the angle, distance from subject, and lighting make a big difference.

For example; the C-47 I recently d/l'd sometimes looks a bit jaggy in dusk/twilight flights until I zoom in a bit then it sharpens right up.
Last edited by U4EA on Sun May 15, 2011 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
U4EA
 

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Sun May 15, 2011 4:09 am

Thanks U4EA...much appreciated... ;)
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby patchz » Sun May 15, 2011 6:01 am

Looking better with AA turned on Doug. In fact, looking very good :)

Compare the inside of the left vertical stabilizer in shots #1 & #2 with shots #3 & #4. It's smoother. So are the struts and wires.

I think you will find your frame rate drops when banking and/or flying over densely populated areas. More buildings, objects, the harder the card has to work.

And something I have learned, at least with my setup, is setting the frame rate to unlimited causes too much difference between the lowest and highest

rates, thus inducing stutters. I usually lock my frame rate at either 25 or 30, depending on the area I'm flying. Boonies at 30, large cities/airports with lots of objects at 25.

But what works for one system may not for another. If you are getting equal or better performance with frame rate set at unlimited, and not seeing

a big drop at times and stutters or micro stutters, then you should set it at unlimited.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby CHUCK79 » Sun May 15, 2011 11:07 am

Looking GREAT Doug 8-)
I do think that there is a significant difference in jaggie reduction with your AA on.
I also agree with Larry about the frame rates. I usually lock mine between 25 and 30 too :)
Last edited by CHUCK79 on Sun May 15, 2011 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CHUCK79
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6168
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:13 am
Location: KOMK

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Sun May 15, 2011 5:55 pm

Thanks Larry and Chuck...your time, patience and knowledge along with the help from far too many to mention here at Simviation make this a wonderful hobby.   ;)
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Daube » Mon May 16, 2011 7:16 am

Hi Doug,

I've been taking a close look to your last two series of screeshots.
Indeed the textures are now looking MUCH BETTER than in your old screeshots.
You did a great job with FSWC as well, your water looks really good now.

The last problem I can spot in your screenshots is the AntiAliasing, as other members stated already.

You said before that you had a NVidia 8800 video card. What is the rest of your computer components ? I'd like specifically to hear about your CPU. Then I should be able to provide a bit of advise to configure your sim properly to achieve better FPS as well as better graphic quality.
User avatar
Daube
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 6604
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Nice (FR)

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Mon May 16, 2011 8:45 am

Thanks a lot Stephane... :)
Last edited by Flying Trucker on Mon May 16, 2011 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Daube » Mon May 16, 2011 9:09 am

Perfect, thanks Doug :)
What are your current settings in the game ?
User avatar
Daube
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 6604
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Nice (FR)

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Mon May 16, 2011 1:55 pm

Hi Stephane

Unlimited...1280X800X32 Pixels
most of the time...AS Anisotropy...AA Anti Aliasing ON...No Light Bloom

Global Options:
Last edited by Flying Trucker on Mon May 16, 2011 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Daube » Tue May 17, 2011 6:06 am

Perfect :)

You need to change the water though. Max 2x is a very expensive setting, in terms of FPS. I'd recommend you to stay at High 2x.

For the terrain settings, you should probably limit the ground texture resolution to 1 meter instead of 7 centimeters as it is now. For the autogen, the setting is good, but you probably want to write the autogen tweaks in the FSX.cfg to make the autogen less heavy on the FPS. I'm referring to the two lines in the [TERRAIN] section (you have to add them, they don't exist by defaut):
TERRAIN_MAX_AUTOGEN_TREES_PER_CELL=1000
TERRAIN_MAX_AUTOGEN_BUILDINGS_PER_CELL=300

The values are low, but it's because your CPU is not very fast, so it would not be a good idea to raise them too much. The good thing with those lines is that you can keep you autogen slider at "very dense" in the game, the autogen will still look dense close to your position.

For the AI traffic, it's up to you, but remember that airport vehicules can be very heavy on the FPS when you get close to big airports, so keep that setting low, that is minimum or disabled... but really, just try various settings, and see what you get (in terms of performance) in your favorite places ;)

One last thing: it's probably better to disable the AntiAliasing in the game and force it through the video drivers settings. Do you know how to do that or do you need any exlanations ?
User avatar
Daube
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 6604
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Nice (FR)

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Tue May 17, 2011 6:47 am

Good morning Stephane...


[glow=yellow,2,300]One last thing: it's probably better to disable the AntiAliasing in the game and force it through the video drivers settings. Do you know how to do that or do you need any exlanations ? [/glow]

I will need some help there Stephane... :)

Off to make the other changes right now...again thanks... ;)
Last edited by Flying Trucker on Tue May 17, 2011 6:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Skunkworks » Tue May 17, 2011 9:12 am

[color=#0000ff]Hi Doug. Just to confirm a couple of things
about Daube's good advice. In my latest screenies, I've
kept the water at low2x with no appreciable difference
between that setting and the next two highest. This will gain some FPS also!

He's also 100% about forcing AA through your Nvidia video drivers instead of FSX.
Uncheck the AntiAliasing box in the graphics settings of
FSX to disable in the games control of AA.

Unfortunately I'm running ATI cards, so I don't have an
Nvidia control panel. In the Nvidia control panel there is a
section called 3D options and in that menu their are global
settings and game specific profiles to help force what ever
settings your 8800 is capable of. I'll stop there as it's been
too long since I've done this, just to say your in good
hands with Daube.
Howdy! Safe and Happy Flying! Image Best concert/airshow ever!
User avatar
Skunkworks
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2432
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:46 pm
Location: Central San Joaquin California

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Flying Trucker » Tue May 17, 2011 9:36 am

Thanks Greg...very much appreciated.... ;)
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Flying Trucker
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 14398
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:28 pm

Re: HMMM...not sure...Part two

Postby Daube » Tue May 17, 2011 10:01 am

Thanks Greg for this additionnal info !

Doug, I'll provide you more details when I'll be home with my computer, because I need to have the tools in front of my eyes to explain precisely :)
Don't fear however, the modifications will NOT be complex at all.
You could, in the meanwhile, download and install a freeware tool nammed NVidia Inspector, which will help you modify the video driver settings. Then I will try to explain you how to use it ;)
Last edited by Daube on Tue May 17, 2011 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Daube
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 6604
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Nice (FR)

Next

Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Daube and 544 guests