Visiting the Solomons...

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

Visiting the Solomons...

Postby patchz » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:13 am

[color=#000000]Think they will let me trap?


Image

Image



They said no, the pattern is full. ::)
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby CHUCK79 » Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:31 am

Great shots Larry :)
I think landing WWII taildraggers on a carrier is a little trickier then landing jets with tri-cycle style gear.
I think (for me anyway) it's just harder to see over those long noses ;)
User avatar
CHUCK79
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6168
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:13 am
Location: KOMK

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby patchz » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:46 pm

Great shots Larry :)
I think landing WWII taildraggers on a carrier is a little trickier then landing jets with tri-cycle style gear.
I think (for me anyway) it's just harder to see over those long noses ;)

Thanks Chuck. :)
You are correct, but that is where TrackIR helps out. You can look to the side. You can do it with the keyboard, but it takes to long to move back and forth, where TrackIR is as quick as you turn your head. However, as I understand it, you have the same problem in the jets, IF done properly. Which means about 12-15 degree nose up, yet just enough power to avoid stall yet still negative on the VSI. I am terrible at carrier landings. I have tremendous respect for those that do it for real. Add night, wind, a pitching deck, and rain and I would crash every time. :(
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby olderndirt » Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:32 pm

Great shots Larry :)
I think landing WWII taildraggers on a carrier is a little trickier then landing jets with tri-cycle style gear.
I think (for me anyway) it's just harder to see over those long noses ;)

Thanks Chuck. :)
You are correct, but that is where TrackIR helps out. You can look to the side. You can do it with the keyboard, but it takes to long to move back and forth, where TrackIR is as quick as you turn your head. However, as I understand it, you have the same problem in the jets, IF done properly. Which means about 12-15 degree nose up, yet just enough power to avoid stall yet still negative on the VSI. I am terrible at carrier landings. I have tremendous respect for those that do it for real. Add night, wind, a pitching deck, and rain and I would crash every time. :(
Once is often enough  :D.
[img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/oldrt18.jpg
User avatar
olderndirt
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3495
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:07 pm
Location: Rochester, WA

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby CHUCK79 » Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:51 pm

Great shots Larry :)
I think landing WWII taildraggers on a carrier is a little trickier then landing jets with tri-cycle style gear.
I think (for me anyway) it's just harder to see over those long noses ;)

Thanks Chuck. :)
You are correct, but that is where TrackIR helps out. You can look to the side. You can do it with the keyboard, but it takes to long to move back and forth, where TrackIR is as quick as you turn your head. However, as I understand it, you have the same problem in the jets, IF done properly. Which means about 12-15 degree nose up, yet just enough power to avoid stall yet still negative on the VSI. I am terrible at carrier landings. I have tremendous respect for those that do it for real. Add night, wind, a pitching deck, and rain and I would crash every time. :(


Yeah, so would I ;D
Sometimes it would be a controlled crash though ;)
This TrackIR tool sounds very interasting.
Last edited by CHUCK79 on Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CHUCK79
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6168
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:13 am
Location: KOMK

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby patchz » Tue Dec 28, 2010 4:52 am

[color=#000000]I took off from Pensacola a little while ago in the T-45 and 'set the fleet'. I did three traps and three launches. The traps were ok, but not pretty. I would have been fussed at. I finally got the launch bar to hook up and the

launch would have been fine if my *&%$# joystick had not chosen that moment to short out for a few seconds. The second was better, as I remembered to retract the launch bar before the landing gear. And the third was

very good. At least now I can get a lot of practice. I need it.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby CHUCK79 » Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:45 am

[quote][color=#000000]I took off from Pensacola a little while ago in the T-45 and 'set the fleet'. I did three traps and three launches. The traps were ok, but not pretty. I would have been fussed at. I finally got the launch bar to hook up and the

launch would have been fine if my *&%$# joystick had not chosen that moment to short out for a few seconds. The second was better, as I remembered to retract the launch bar before the landing gear. And the third was

very good. At least now I can get a lot of practice. I need it.
Last edited by CHUCK79 on Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CHUCK79
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 6168
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:13 am
Location: KOMK

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby patchz » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:18 am

[quote][quote][color=#000000]I took off from Pensacola a little while ago in the T-45 and 'set the fleet'. I did three traps and three launches. The traps were ok, but not pretty. I would have been fussed at. I finally got the launch bar to hook up and the

launch would have been fine if my *&%$# joystick had not chosen that moment to short out for a few seconds. The second was better, as I remembered to retract the launch bar before the landing gear. And the third was

very good. At least now I can get a lot of practice. I need it.
Last edited by patchz on Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS

Re: Visiting the Solomons...

Postby patchz » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:43 am

Turns out I had the original, not the upgrade. The upgrade is better. Thanks for the heads up. :)
Image
If God intended aircraft engines to have horizontally opposed engines, Pratt and Whitney would have made them that way.
User avatar
patchz
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10424
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:33 pm
Location: IN THE FUNNY PAPERS


Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 384 guests