Mixed Bag of Delights

[john_uk]

waspi's secret is uncovered here!

like it sais, anyone can just pause, max settings take the screenshot, put settings back and continue to fly.

but they do still look nice.

[waspiflab]

If only I had time to wait for the settings to load for every shot
Put it this way, I did not spend 60quid for FSX to look like FS98 so I have my settings at resonable fps but nowhere near what they should be. Mines lags like everybody else.
Most of my scenery, planes etc comes from avsim.com only because they bring the latest freeware out every single day, thats why your more than likely to get a shot from me most days because I love downloading new stuff as it makes flying and shots more interesting. I refuse to play this game looking like a piece of crap, whats the point??
Cheers for all the comments
Waspi
p.s. HURRY UP WITH THAT BLOODY PATCH!!!

[alrot]

you have got to be kidding me!!!with your permition


I always consider waspiflab the best in this ,but this one deserve a novel , How come??? This one when to far..!! I mean is very good! Looks as a photo ,this a scenery and add-on ,right? wich one?

[Black ZR-1]

waspi's secret is uncovered here!

like it sais, anyone can just pause, max settings take the screenshot, put settings back and continue to fly.

but they do still look nice.

And here, http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2 ... 2404464/17

What amazes me is how people don't understand that no system to this date can play FSX on the settings that Waspi represents in his screenshots. Not even close! And especially not with his hardware.

But hey, if the guy gets a kick out of pausing it, maxing everything out and saying 'Hey guys! here are my screenshots!", then he's really good at taking them. But I've told him before that he's misleading people with the hardware that he's running with the screenshots he's representing.

[waspiflab]

It's from a payware site that has 2 free download areas ( not demos ) but cannot remember what it's called, I'll try and find out.
Please I dont pause then max out that would take forever. Try some freeware stuff you can get better fps, trees, ground texture etc etc.

[john_uk]

waspi's secret is uncovered here!

like it sais, anyone can just pause, max settings take the screenshot, put settings back and continue to fly.

but they do still look nice.

And here, http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2 ... 2404464/17

What amazes me is how people don't understand that no system to this date can play FSX on the settings that Waspi represents in his screenshots. Not even close! And especially not with his hardware.

But hey, if the guy gets a kick out of pausing it, maxing everything out and saying 'Hey guys! here are my screenshots!", then he's really good at taking them. But I've told him before that he's misleading people with the hardware that he's running with the screenshots he's representing.

i agree, it is misleading, but you can not deny that they are good screenshots.

[alrot]

Im agree, I admit that when I took many shot in my Old p3 I had to pause then add scenery (Just for Shots) But waspi Has a good eye indeed.. 8-)

[francsal]

waspi's secret is uncovered here!

like it sais, anyone can just pause, max settings take the screenshot, put settings back and continue to fly.

but they do still look nice.

And here, http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2 ... 2404464/17

What amazes me is how people don't understand that no system to this date can play FSX on the settings that Waspi represents in his screenshots. Not even close! And especially not with his hardware.

But hey, if the guy gets a kick out of pausing it, maxing everything out and saying 'Hey guys! here are my screenshots!", then he's really good at taking them. But I've told him before that he's misleading people with the hardware that he's running with the screenshots he's representing.

Well, just adding my 2 cents here:

first of all, as far as I remember, this is a SCREENSHOT formum. Not a "FPS and hardware performance" forum. Obviously, when we see screenshots of such high qualiy as those from Waspiflab, we are inmediately interested in learning about his system specs so that we can a.)purchase a similar setup or b.) dream about getting hardware like that (as is my case

[Black ZR-1]

[quote]Well, just adding my 2 cents here:

first of all, as far as I remember, this is a SCREENSHOT formum. Not a "FPS and hardware performance" forum. Obviously, when we see screenshots of such high qualiy as those from Waspiflab, we are inmediately interested in learning about his system specs so that we can a.)purchase a similar setup or b.) dream about getting hardware like that (as is my case

[john_uk]

waspi's secret is uncovered here!

like it sais, anyone can just pause, max settings take the screenshot, put settings back and continue to fly.

but they do still look nice.

And here, http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2 ... 2404464/17

What amazes me is how people don't understand that no system to this date can play FSX on the settings that Waspi represents in his screenshots. Not even close! And especially not with his hardware.

But hey, if the guy gets a kick out of pausing it, maxing everything out and saying 'Hey guys! here are my screenshots!", then he's really good at taking them. But I've told him before that he's misleading people with the hardware that he's running with the screenshots he's representing.

Well, just adding my 2 cents here:

first of all, as far as I remember, this is a SCREENSHOT formum. Not a "FPS and hardware performance" forum. Obviously, when we see screenshots of such high qualiy as those from Waspiflab, we are inmediately interested in learning about his system specs so that we can a.)purchase a similar setup or b.) dream about getting hardware like that (as is my case  ;) ) in order to get SCREENSHOTS similiar to those that perked our interest.

Now, if this forum was dedicated to discuss how to get the most FPS from FSX (too much acronyms for my taste  ;D )I think that then it MIGHT be worthy to start discussing if Waspi is really getting 25-30 FPS frames per second. But, since that is not the case here, I think that we should appreciate the quality of the shots, and wonder how to improve our screen shot abilities, and finally, use this forum for what it is: enjoying te eye candy that the flight simulator series from Micro$oft has to offer.

And regarding performance, there are plenty of factors that can alter the whole equation, ranging from motherboard manufacturer, memory manufacturer, and even luck or the great pumpkin. I know for a fact that two supposedly "exactly equal" systems does not perform equally at all... and when you start digging up the systems, find some subtle differences that add up to an absolute different experience.

Are FPS frames per second important to us simmers? Well, OF COURSE they are.  And I think that most users are well aware that FSX Flight Simulator X ten (I must remember to stop using those god awful acronyms!  ;D  ;D ) is a resource hog, and that it will not perform to its FULLEST with the now available hardware. But that does not means that somebody can get DECENT performance from today

[waspiflab]

My Fsx is nowhere near maxed out it's only half way + I get slow fps in most areas, my system is old a AMD 3400 but I just enjoy taking shots , thats what this forums all about. Why pay all the cash for rubbish graphics thats all. I told you before the Amd 64 range and ati cards are a coulpe made in heaven.
anyway enough jibber jabber I got some belters coming your way,
Drop it now
cheers
Waspi
god it's like being back at school

[fighter25]

Amazing again!

[krigl]

These shots are moving me still closer to buying FSX Waspi, MS should pay you a salary....

Guys, Waspi isn't MISLEADING anybody. This isn't a forum for bragging about one's system. Waspi is using FSX to create screenart. This a screenshot forum.

If he IS pausing it and raising his settings, so what? That is exactly what I will be doing when I get FSX  :)
He says he isn't. So why don't we just believe him. A lot of people say they are real pilots. Nobody gives them the Spanish inquisition, asking them to post pictures of their licence etc.... Scudrunners claims to have piloted choppers in 'Nam. Nobody wants to see photographic evidence  ::)

What does it prove anyway if he CAN fly with FSX maxed out? It proves he has a lot of money, more than me. So what.
Trying to force him to PROVE that he's getting high FPS is pointless too... FSX runs differently on different set ups, sometimes well, sometimes badly. And why does he need to prove anything?

If people choose to post screenshots that look terrible because that's what FSX (or FS9) looks like on their system - otherwise the game isn't playable - and don't take any effort to improve them by tweaking, downloading great scenery add-ons etc or doing the pause and max out trip, that's up to them. Arguably they might get better visuals on FS2002 and are wasting there time with the newer sims, but that's their problem.

I know, I know, people might buy FSX just because of seeing Waspis shots and then regret it. Well... that goes for everthing on here right?

Waspi chooses to post great pics, and how exactly he gets them is pretty irrelevant. I know who's pictures I'd rather see.  :)

Cheers

Krigl

[Black ZR-1]

Guys, Waspi isn't MISLEADING anybody

http://www.simviation.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1171034163/15

If he IS pausing it and raising his settings, so what? That is exactly what I will be doing when I get FSX  :)
He says he isn't. So why don't we just believe him. A lot of people say they are real pilots. Nobody gives them the Spanish inquisition, asking them to post pictures of their licence etc.... Scudrunners claims to have piloted choppers in 'Nam. Nobody wants to see photographic evidence  ::)

Then you must really enjoy long loading times.

All the proof you need is in his sig.

What does it prove anyway if he CAN fly with FSX maxed out? It proves he has a lot of money, more than me. So what.
Trying to force him to PROVE that he's getting high FPS is pointless too... FSX runs differently on different set ups, sometimes well, sometimes badly. And why does he need to prove anything?

What does it prove? It proves a lot. Wouldn't you like to know how his system is capable of running FSX maxed out when your computer specs are almost identical to his wondering how it's even possible for him to achieve what he achieves? It's impossible to achieve those settings with current hardware and especially with only 1 gig of ram. We all know that. But if he's actually getting that type of performance I suggest he opens a business selling that method because the hardware he is running will not do what he suggests it does alone.

If people choose to post screenshots that look terrible because that's what FSX (or FS9) looks like on their system - otherwise the game isn't playable - and don't take any effort to improve them by tweaking, downloading great scenery add-ons etc or doing the pause and max out trip, that's up to them. Arguably they might get better visuals on FS2002 and are wasting there time with the newer sims, but that's their problem.

Just about every screenshot thread I've seen of Waspi's, there's always someone asking him how he plays FSX with his settings. Everytime he either dodges the question or just doesn't respond at all and leaves that person hanging - wondering how they can have their FSX like his and that's just wrong. All you have to do is answer the guy. It's not that hard.

I know, I know, people might buy FSX just because of seeing Waspis shots and then regret it. Well... that goes for everthing on here right?

And how would you feel if you were that person?

[waspiflab]

Please shut the F$$K UP!!!!Black
I want my mom