They did it again...

[murjax]

Looks like you have a small fire on board. You better land quickly.  ;D

[ashaman]

Get it over with, people. A VC is not necessary if the model, the dynamics and a good panel are given. And beside the point, the people at POSKY, iFdg, Melvin Rafi, or whoever else in the freeware world do what they do because they want, not because they're paid for it.

The insistent requests of people that want a lot but give nothing (not even RESPECT) can only bring to Mike Stone like situations. Because of a bunch of brats that had to spout their mouth WE ALL lost a freeware designer. It's SO much better now, isn't it?

It's freeware. You don't pay for it, you have no right to whine it's not made with all the bell and whistles you'd like it to. You may ask politely, but have no ground to expect your wishes granted from people you don't pay. No one is going to cram it down your throat, if you don't want to use it. Let those who want to use it enjoy themselves though.

Let it be clear that what I wrote in this message is not directed toward anyone on this forum. It's simply a rant of mine towards the BRATS of flight simulation. The Mike Stone affair embittered me quite a lot.

[Sakura]

Looks awesome :O...but what's with the sparks in 4, 5, and 6 :-? .

- Kevin

As Stated Above there was a tail strike, but the POSKY Sparks Effect has a bug which means unfortuatly it dosen't stop after the tail comes out of contact with the Runway.

[ATI_7500]

A VC is not necessary if the model, the dynamics and a good panel are given.

I'm using VCs instead of 2D panels.

What should I do if I wanted to fly a 742 very badly?

[ashaman]

I'm using VCs instead of 2D panels.

What should I do if I wanted to fly a 742 very badly?

I respect your choice, and you have to respect the work of those who rather than give you a shitty VC, prefer to give instead the freedom to install a good 2D panel.

What would you feel if, say POSKY, made a VC that is a WC (sorry for the pun ) only because they were asked by too many people that wanted it, but they could not work on it and were pestered to publish it at any cost? They have a life to live, the guys of freeware. A good VC needs a lot of work and no one has the right to ask to people that give away a thing for free more than what they can or feel to give. Nor would be useful for them to publish a plane complete with a great VC for FS9 when all the simmers are using FS14.

You want a 742 with VC badly? There's a excellent payware out there, the "Boeing 747-200 Ready for Pushback". The VC there is very good, and the add-on doesn't cost all that much. And in the end, flying the RFP with all its systems simulated, is a lot more like flying the real deal than a VC default-style, wouldn't you agree?

In the end, I don't know you, but I prefer a well done 2D panel to a VC put together in a hurry only to make people shut up (see: default-style).

[2992]

Looking good