An225 loaded

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

An225 loaded

Postby DaveT » Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:10 pm

an An225 loaded up for a long journey
Image

A couple of hours later
Image
Last edited by DaveT on Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaveT
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2260
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:46 pm
Location: KGSO

Re: An225 loaded

Postby ashaman » Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:27 pm

Well, that plane isn't used for that kind of transportations anymore (and when it did, it was only show. The Buran never really became what it boasted). 8-)
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: An225 loaded

Postby Isak922 » Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:48 pm

Well, that plane isn't used for that kind of transportations anymore (and when it did, it was only show. The Buran never really became what it boasted). 8-)


Really? I thought the AN-225 still did large cargo operations for whoever "rents" the plane for the time being?

Nice shot btw  :D
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
User avatar
Isak922
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: An225 loaded

Postby CSM » Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:05 am

nice shots especially the second one 8-)
Image
MacBook (Need I Say More)
User avatar
CSM
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 1:54 am
Location: Townsville, North Queensland

Re: An225 loaded

Postby ashaman » Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:34 am

Really? I thought the AN-225 still did large cargo operations for whoever "rents" the plane for the time being?


Of course it does, and of course it would, but why should the Russians pay to transport a piece of failed experimental space shuttle look-alike is beyond me. After all, I don't think that the renting to the 225 is exactly cheap. ;)
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: An225 loaded

Postby Scudrunner » Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:39 am

Really? I thought the AN-225 still did large cargo operations for whoever "rents" the plane for the time being?


Of course it does, and of course it would, but why should the Russians pay to transport a piece of failed experimental space shuttle look-alike is beyond me. After all, I don't think that the renting to the 225 is exactly cheap. ;)


This is a simulator so why no simulate? If you want the real thing, you need to get up from your computer chair, head out the door and dig deep into your cash reserves.
Scudrunner
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:09 pm
Location: USA

Re: An225 loaded

Postby FridayChild » Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:51 am

Buran was a fine machine. Too bad it ended the way it ended.
Founder of A.A.A.A.A.A.A. (Aircraft Amateurs' Association Against Absurd Aviation Acronyms) My system specifications: FLIGHT SIMULATOR 2004 - AMD Athlon 64 3200+ CPU - 3 GB PC-3200 DDR400 dual channel RAM - 500 GB Seagate B
User avatar
FridayChild
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1570
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:22 am
Location: Italia

Re: An225 loaded

Postby ashaman » Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:25 am

This is a simulator so why no simulate? If you want the real thing, you need to get up from your computer chair, head out the door and dig deep into your cash reserves.


Well, of course. I was only nitpicking. ;)

You know for example that a lot of people wouldn't want Kai Tak not Meigs on their sims anymore because they don't exist in real life no more, while without them I would feel my sim to miss something. Meigs whereabouts is the only american soil I fly over, and not even all that often too. And I'm an aficionado of Kai Tak ever since FS98, and landing there is something I enjoy doing from time to time (even if since I got the pedals it's way easier that the old FS98 times). :D

So why not simming a Buran transport. Still it's something that doesn't happens in real life anymore. ;)


Buran was a fine machine. Too bad it ended the way it ended.


How can you say it was a fine whatever if it never, not even once was used in space. :-?
Last edited by ashaman on Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: An225 loaded

Postby FridayChild » Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:57 am

On her maiden flight she was able to land flawlessly with no pilots on board, fully automatically. The Buran was designed to carry more payload (and to carry more payload back to Earth) than the Space Shuttle Orbiter. And it was designed in a way that all its elements were reusable (as opposite to the Space Shuttle, which central tank is not reusable). The Buran had no engines of its own, it relied fully on the Energia rocket booster and the four solid state rocket boosters to get into space, hence it was a true glider. The thermal protection system was different from that of the Shuttle, and possibly better. For more info, see this link. It definitely was a promising and fine machine; too bad economic restrictions forced the government to retire the project before it made it into space. Sadly, the only Buran which actually flew was destroyed when the hangar in which the whole vehicle had been withdrawn collapsed under the weight of its roof.
Last edited by FridayChild on Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Founder of A.A.A.A.A.A.A. (Aircraft Amateurs' Association Against Absurd Aviation Acronyms) My system specifications: FLIGHT SIMULATOR 2004 - AMD Athlon 64 3200+ CPU - 3 GB PC-3200 DDR400 dual channel RAM - 500 GB Seagate B
User avatar
FridayChild
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1570
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:22 am
Location: Italia

Re: An225 loaded

Postby Anark » Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:56 pm

Due to lack of maintainance, Ironicly, all the people who were supposed to maintain it were killed in the accident.
Image

Intel Core2 Quad @2.40GHz, Vista Ultimate, NVIDIA 8500GT, 500GB internal HDD and 250GB external.

[center]My [url=http://www.myaviation.net/sear
User avatar
Anark
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:12 am
Location: Yorkshire

Re: An225 loaded

Postby Ivan » Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:18 pm

There were plans to fit Buran with 4 D-30 engines to make it more flexible in case of a misjudged re-entry... one of the flyable prototypes had 4 jet engines fitted (AFAIK the one that eventually ended up in australia)
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: An225 loaded

Postby DaveT » Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:41 pm

hey guys didn't expect all that but great cheers(didn't know anything about it myself
User avatar
DaveT
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2260
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:46 pm
Location: KGSO

Re: An225 loaded

Postby an-225 » Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:12 pm

Wait a minute... Ivan you are talking about Buran analogue right? They DID do that but it wasn't incase of a misjudged re-entry. It was to judge how stable Buran would be in atmospheric flight. But... yeah I guess I'm one of the lucky few who got to see Buran analogue when it came to sydney.  ;D Personally I think its a great design.  ;)
an-225
 


Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JakesF14 and 869 guests