FSX/FS9 compare

Flight Simulation Screenshots displaying your Flight Simulation Experience. MSFS, FSX, Prepar3D, XPlane and other Flight Simulators. Focus is your Flight Simulator Experience. Please upload to Simviation (Button at top right)

FSX/FS9 compare

Postby Scudrunner » Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:56 pm

FSX
sliders at default (about 1/3) (note frame rates)
Over Los Angeles. Note scenery
     Image

FS9
all sliders at max  (note frame rates)
over Los Angeles (note scenery)
     Image
Last edited by Scudrunner on Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Scudrunner
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:09 pm
Location: USA

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby yancovitch » Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:01 pm

picture's worth a thousand words... :)
i7-7700k ....msi geforce gtx 1060....msi z270 gaming m5 lga 1151 motherboard....CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) ram.....
User avatar
yancovitch
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 12:48 pm
Location: born montreal, lived vancouver, now live in burns lake bc.

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby murjax » Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:51 pm

The FS9 scenery looks much better. There are more buildings.  :)
Image
I am just a train fan who happens to like flying and attempting to get the better of the mods especially those with 20/20 vision ;D ;D
User avatar
murjax
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1152
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:18 am
Location: Jacksonville,FL

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby Lazerbeak » Sun Dec 10, 2006 6:04 pm

Hmm, not sure what it is you're trying to illustrate here. The only thing I'm seeing is that (A) FS9 with full sliders looks better than FSX with very low settings (huge shocker there), and (B) your computer is apparently not at all well-equipped to run FSX...
Image

The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
User avatar
Lazerbeak
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 703
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:21 pm
Location: A house.

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby Katahu » Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:58 pm

The default terrain mesh in FS9 looks pathetic even with max settings when compared to the default terrain mesh of FSX with max terrain settings.

Here are some examples:

Please note the system that I'm using, what settings I have applied for each example and what frames I get.

FSX Interlaken - Part 1

FSX Interlaken - Part 2

FS9 Interlaken

Here's another example posted by Sgt Flymo.

FSX Interlaken - By Flymo

I'm pretty sure there's more examples out there that compares FSX and FS9.

Of course, the frames are better in these shots because all of the shots were taken in a mountainous area which is far from civilization. So I clearly understand that the frames will drop big time when flying in places like New York city or London. Me, I like flying in rural areas because it feels so calm and the view of the terrain [regardless of which version of FS you're flying in] can easy beat the local cities hands down. With terrain, you rarely see any two mountains that look the same while the autogen is nothing more than repetative boxes.

In terms of terrain mesh, FSX beats FS9 hands down in my opinion.
In terms of textures for the terrain, both sims seem to be tied in my opinion.
In terms which version is the most wierd, FS9 wins. Tell me, how do the frame rates go up after applying higher settings?
In terms of dynamics, FSX and FS9 are tied as there appears to be little or no change except that the Extra 300 can now do flat spins.
User avatar
Katahu
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 10:29 pm

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby NicksFXHouse » Mon Dec 11, 2006 12:28 am

I must agree, a picture is worth 1000 words.




I would post the full size 1920x1200 FSX image but I would get my knuckles wacked, people on dialup would be screaming and some of you guys would be scrolling forever
Last edited by NicksFXHouse on Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
NicksFXHouse
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby an-225 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:13 am

To the thread starter: I have every slider just A LITTLE bit below max. We're talking every slider set to high but not ultra high. I have full AI (excluding cars), with MyTrafficX installed. THOUSANDS of aircraft roam the skies. I get 9fps. All I can say is to get better hardware. Oh and Nick N I like the new sig.  ;)
Last edited by an-225 on Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
an-225
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby DizZa » Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:56 am

[quote]To the thread starter: I have every slider just A LITTLE bit below max. We're talking every slider set to high but not ultra high. I have full AI (excluding cars), with MyTrafficX installed. THOUSANDS of aircraft roam the skies. I get 9fps. All I can say is to get better hardware. Oh and Nick N I like the new sig.
DizZa
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby NicksFXHouse » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:13 am

[quote][quote]To the thread starter: I have every slider just A LITTLE bit below max. We're talking every slider set to high but not ultra high. I have full AI (excluding cars), with MyTrafficX installed. THOUSANDS of aircraft roam the skies. I get 9fps. All I can say is to get better hardware. Oh and Nick N I like the new sig.
NicksFXHouse
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby DizZa » Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:50 am

Oh ok.

Man I get 70fps maxing out fs9 including all driver settings. Heh.....
DizZa
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby an-225 » Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:22 am

Woah, lots of autogen there Nick.  :o Which reminds me, I have made the "tree/building per cell" mod to my FSX.cfg. Will removing it do any harm at all?
an-225
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby alrot » Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:01 am

You haven't set in FSX scenery complex &  autogen In fact all the scenery clompexity as in FSX
That isn't out of the questioning of course FSX it has much much better real grafic than fs9
Image

Venezuela
User avatar
alrot
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8961
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:47 am

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby flymo » Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:56 am

im sorry but you can not compare FS9 and FSX like that, its possibly the worst comparison.
to do it properly you need the sliders in the same place on both sims then you can do a truely equal comparison.
in both sims i have the sliders basicly maxed and i will do a little comparison once i have FS9 installed again.

but trust me, if you have semi decent hardware (like me :D) FSX is a gem and FS9 is just a rock

john
flymo
 

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby yancovitch » Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:11 pm

well thats encouraging to hear :)
i7-7700k ....msi geforce gtx 1060....msi z270 gaming m5 lga 1151 motherboard....CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) ram.....
User avatar
yancovitch
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 12:48 pm
Location: born montreal, lived vancouver, now live in burns lake bc.

Re: FSX/FS9 compare

Postby BourneID » Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:32 pm

Its alot like folks that complain about FS9 w/ gobs of payware is better then FXS defult...
Last edited by BourneID on Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
BourneID
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:47 pm

Next

Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 655 guests