Simviation Forums

by **Stormtropper** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:28 pm

Getting it to pull that many G's might be a different story ::)

by **|| Andy ||** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:36 pm

http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes/su-34_fullback.pl

It can..
Its a bigger version of the Su-27 but has 54,000lbs of thrust... alot more than the su-27

EDIT: http://www.danshistory.com/su34.html
Shows on there 8g

by **|| Andy ||** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:39 pm

ooooo sorry its +8g

by **Stormtropper** » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:55 pm

Still, that things big, fat, flatk, and ugly...hard to believe...

I'll stick with a F-15 anyday

by **X56SB** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:37 am

that looks unsafe

by **Flt.Lt.Andrew** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:01 am

Thats tiny!
Looks more flimsy than a Cessna!

A.

by **Scorpiоn** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:11 am

Funny - save the paintjob, I think she looks better that an F-15.

by **|| Andy ||** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 6:58 am

Still, that things big, fat, flatk, and ugly...hard to believe...

UGLY!!!
omg...
no taste... :-/

by **flyboy 28** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 12:24 pm

8g max.. not bad for a bomber

What do you think the F-15E is?

Certainly not an interceptor.

by **|| Andy ||** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:09 pm

Hmmm ja..
But as its designation says
F-15
not B-15..

and the f-15 is tiny compaired to the su-34

by **jknight8907** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:57 pm

Hmmm ja..
But as its designation says
F-15
not B-15..

and the f-15 is tiny compaired to the su-34

Know what the designation for the Nighthawk is? F-117.

'Nuff said.

by **|| Andy ||** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:06 pm

Ja i c what you mean there..
But still.. its a compleatly different style of plane

by **Stormtropper** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:20 pm

Yeah, bomber load out, but with A2A capabilities and flys like a figher....2x the bang for the money

by **|| Andy ||** » Sat Mar 19, 2005 5:01 pm

Same with the Su-34..
Except thats 'stealthy'

Uh oh