Interesting

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

Re: Interesting

Postby TacitBlue » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:28 pm

Totaly off topic, but: I'm still not clear on whether "pants" is good or bad. :P
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: Interesting

Postby Smoke2much » Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:32 pm

It entirely depends on the circumstances ;D
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: Interesting

Postby Hagar » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:26 pm

Totaly off topic, but: I'm still not clear on whether "pants" is good or bad. :P

From the American's guide to British colloquial slang. It's entitled "Oi! Yanks! No!" but you'd have to be familiar with comedian Harry Enfield to understand that. ;)
Pants = underwear. They're *underwear*. Not trousers. Also mild swearword.
As Smoke says, the word pants has various other meanings depending on the cirumstances but generally means knickers or a load of old rubbish.

More examples of our strange lingo here. Warning, some are just a tad rude. http://www.kabukivice.com/oiyanks/slang.html
Last edited by Hagar on Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Interesting

Postby Jimbo » Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Lol that is 'bloody mint' Hagar....Saved it in my fav's already..lol that is great, had be in tears some of the stuff just to know how different we pronounce different things!
Cheers Doug and keep on finding the great funny stuff

LOL

James
..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
User avatar
Jimbo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:09 am
Location: HOMETOWN: Sheffield UK, Living: Perth, AU

Re: Interesting

Postby JBaymore » Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:20 pm

Will,

A lot depends on what speed you are paying for!  If your broadband connection is supposed to be XXXXXXX up and XXXXXX down.... and you can consistently show that it is NOT that...... you have a real beef with your provider.

Then THEY have to show you WHY you are not getting the speed....... maybe in the process identifying the issues on your end that they are NOT responsible for.

If they are just "shorting you"...... then you have a reasonable consumer complaint to file.  being "telecommunications" companies... they MIGHT be "regulated" in such matters....... and sensitive to negative publicity.

Give it a check at many times during the day and keep the image files.  Then you have some documentation of the performance.

best,

......................john
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Interesting

Postby Triple_7 » Tue Aug 09, 2005 12:35 am

Anyone up for a trade ;D :(

I've ran this same test a couple of times before...This is a good night...I've had worse :-/ >:(
Image

Thanks to my mom signing up for this cable deal without me knowing and reading anything...We are locked into a contract with this speed for a year...Now theres about 5 months left >:(

Called a tech and argued for awhile...They advertised and even our bills say we are getting highspeed...according to the tech "well, technically it IS highspeed" >:(  I responded with something similar to..."well, technically your @$%@ing company is feeding people a bunch of bull $#$^.  But that doesnt matter to you false advertising @$%#$ anyway." click

Telling the guy off didn't accomplish anything usefull...But I definatly felt a little better :P  Sould have carried on for awhile longer sence they are not allowed to hang up :-X
Triple_7
 

Re: Interesting

Postby Omag 2.0 » Tue Aug 09, 2005 2:53 am

The problem with these broadband-connection seems to be that it's all depending on the local circumstances. A guy who works at my provider explained me that for instance, the distance from your home to the digital phone-center influences the speed. Also the number of users on the line that runs to that center could change things... And than you've got all sorts of contratcs with full capacity, narrowed-down variants etc...
[center]
Image

Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be

Or go straight to Omag's Album[/cent
User avatar
Omag 2.0
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9490
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 6:43 am
Location: Somewhere, Belgium

Re: Interesting

Postby Smoke2much » Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:22 am

Thanks John.  I am paying for a 1.1 Mbps connection and it seems that I am getting close to that.  I downloaded a few bits for Neverwinter Nights and maintained an average of 90KB/s.  It took 47 minutes to download a 240MB file, from Microsoft the GMax game pack for FS2004 took the same amount of time and that is only 15.1MB.

This is all rather confusing and according to BT I'm as far from the exchange as you can get and still get "Broadband".  The man recommended that I turn off all my firewall software...

Wall
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 450 guests