747 Fuel Consumption

Forum dedicated to Microsoft FS2004 - "A Century of Flight".

747 Fuel Consumption

Postby Timbo2015 » Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:12 am

I suspect the fuel flow rates of the standard 747 are screwed up.  I fully loaded the 747 with fuel and removed all other weight save for 2 pilots.  Took off from Brazil, flew at 38,000ft, 0.80 mach, followed the equator east, all the way around the world, and landed at the same airport with about 3000 lbs of fuel left.

If this was accurate, wouldn't someone have just added an auxiliary fuel tank and made an unrefueled around the world trip?  Why wait for Rutan to design 2 special planes to do this?
Timbo2015
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 1:42 pm

Re: 747 Fuel Consumption

Postby ashaman » Thu Mar 31, 2005 7:45 am

If you're talking about the default 747... well, it's hardly a secret that the default planes are hardly the top under the "As Real As It Gets" voice.

On the net you can find better flight dynamics to use (and I believe corrected fuel consumption, though I'm not going to swear on it) if you insist in using Micro$oft's planes. I remember having been on a french site where there was a download about this, sadly I don't remember where this site was, having left behind the default planes long ago and still keeping them on the HD only for AI use.

Really, with a so wide choice of freeware and/or payware add-ons around, why still use the defaults? Download a POSKY or Meljet 747 and step in a better simulated jumbo environment. :)
There's but one real cure for human stupidity. It's called DEATH.

At the moment mourning the assassination of sarcasm and irony for the good of the "higher".

Proud FSIX user. Active user of FS98, X-plane and novic
User avatar
ashaman
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 9:08 am
Location: LIRN

Re: 747 Fuel Consumption

Postby garymbuska » Thu Mar 31, 2005 1:32 pm

I have to agree with ashaman here most of the default aircraft are not very acurate when it comes to fuel loads and burn. I use either the POSKY or the IFDG aircraft they are a lot closer to the real thing. But you have to be carefull some downloads are so far off that it is not even funny, I wish I had a dime for every plane that I have sent to the grave yard due to inacurate weights and fuel burn some of them are so far off the plane hardly flys at all.
Granted some of them or worth the time and trouble to edit them to a more realistic value but for the most part I do not even bother. 8)
Gary M Buska
SYSTEM Specs ASUS P8Z68 V/GEN 3 mother board: INTELL I7 2600k 3.48 ghz Quad core CPU with Sandy bridge: 12 Gigs of 1800hz ram:
GTX 950 OVER CLOCKED: 2 Gigs Ram Windows 10 Home 64 bit Operating system. 750W Dedicated modular power supply. Two Internal 1TB hard drives 1 External 1TB 3.2 USB hard drive. SAITEK Cessna flight Yoke with throttles.
CH Rudder Peddles 27 inch Wide screen Monitor
User avatar
garymbuska
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 11:10 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Re: 747 Fuel Consumption

Postby n_richardson05 » Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:00 am

i get alot of air craft that look great but there too heavy to fly so i just to a little editing and it works out. but for fuel consumpshon just put in less fuel and just pretend  ;D
big or small i like them all ...? that dosent sound right
slew mode dose not count as flying
737-700aholic
User avatar
n_richardson05
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:15 pm
Location: massachussets


Return to FS 2004 - A Century of Flight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 421 guests