by dave3cu » Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:53 am
You might take a look at the aircraft.cfg file and compare the landing gear strut dynamics to those of a similar aircraft.
[contact_points]
//0 Class (1=wheel......
//1 Longitudinal Position (feet)
//2 Lateral Position (feet)
//3 Vertical Position (feet)
//4 Impact Damage Threshold (Feet Per Minute)
//5 Brake Map (0=None, 1=Left, 2=Right)
//6 Wheel Radius (feet)
//7 Steer Angle (degrees)
//8 Static Compression (feet) (0 if rigid)
//9 Max/Static Compression Ratio
//10 Damping Ratio (0=Undamped, 1=Critically Damped)
//11 Extension Time (seconds)
//12 Retraction Time (seconds)
//13 Sound Type
//14 Airspeed limit for retraction (KIAS)
//15 Airspeed that gear gets damage at (KIAS)
//GEAR
point.0= 1, 25.00, 0.000, -12.900, 3000.000, 0.000, .800, 65.000, 0.250, 1.500, 0.900, 8.000, 8.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000
Another possibility might be an errant scrape point. In spot view, take off from a dirt or grass runway and see if any odd scrapes, indicated by a dust cloud, show up.
Dont know if these are the only possibilities, but worth a look.
Cheers,
Dave
At that time [1909] the chief engineer was almost always the chief test pilot as well. That had the fortunate result of eliminating poor engineering early in aviation.