Print view
Board index ‹ Graphic Gallery ‹ Photos & Cameras

For Kris

Your Aviation (or Personal) Photos and discussion on Cameras & photography.
Post a reply

For Kris

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:36 am

 
And another question, can you show the magnification of this lens. Ex a photo of the same area at 100 mm, 300 mm and at 400 mm. I'm dying to know what big a difference the extra 100 mm makes...


Just did it in the garden...

Image      Image      Image      Image      



Image

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Fly2e » Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:39 am

Now that is what I call an example!  ;)
COMING SOON!
User avatar
Fly2e
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 198020
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2002 5:29 pm
Location: KFRG
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby C » Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:20 am

Mic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod... ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D

Only messin'...

I'll get m' coat! ;D
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:22 am

Mic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod... ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D


What's really ironic is that it was taken from a tripod with a remote shutter release....ummm...maybe the wind did it  ::) ::) :P ;D

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby alrot » Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:26 am

>:( makes me wanna throw my stuppid camera against the wall , and it Kodak , Im so regret the quality is so poor , I didn't knew too much about digital cameras
Last edited by alrot on Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Venezuela
User avatar
alrot
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8961
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:47 am
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby flyboy 28 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:50 am

Mic, how much did you pick up your remote shutter release for? How do you like it? I like to do a lot of night photos, so it'd come in handy for myself.
User avatar
flyboy 28
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10266
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 4:01 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:52 am

it was a tenner in my local shop.....it's the really small RC1 wireless one :)

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby C » Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:52 am

Mic, the 300mm is terrible compared to the others. You needed a tripod... ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D


What's really ironic is that it was taken from a tripod with a remote shutter release....ummm...maybe the wind did it  ::) ::) :P ;D

.mic


How odd! ;D There is a definat hint of blur in that one! ;) ;D
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Omag 2.0 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:10 am

Thanks Mic, this really give an idea. And I'm not going to pick on you!
Last edited by Omag 2.0 on Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
[center]
Image

Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be

Or go straight to Omag's Album[/cent
User avatar
Omag 2.0
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9490
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 6:43 am
Location: Somewhere, Belgium
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:15 am

Thanks Mic, this really give an idea. And I'm not going to pick on you!  ;D

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels...

Now if I only could find a bleedn' sunhood... no retailer has those in stock for my lense. Well excuse me if i didn't buy an L-lense!  >:(  ;D


I could sell you an ET60 for a reasonable price ;)

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Omag 2.0 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:43 pm

Won't work... it has to be a ET-65B  ::) The most expensive one, offcourse....
[center]
Image

Check my aviation-photo's at www.airliners.be

Or go straight to Omag's Album[/cent
User avatar
Omag 2.0
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9490
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 6:43 am
Location: Somewhere, Belgium
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Vapour01 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:58 pm

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.
Vapour01
 
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby 61_OTU » Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:10 pm

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.


Were you using the converter with the 300mm?
User avatar
61_OTU
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: The Village - nr Shrewsbury
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby Vapour01 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:26 pm

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.


Were you using the converter with the 300mm?

Nope, before I got the 400 I was using an 80-200 with a converter and before that a 75-300 (no converter with that, obviously!).
Vapour01
 
Top

Re: For Kris

Postby 61_OTU » Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:27 pm

No really, I'm dying to know if I'll be pleased with the reach of my 300 mm at Brussels.

300 is fine, I used it for two years without any real trouble, I got the 400 for it's far better quality more than the extra 100mm.


Were you using the converter with the 300mm?

Nope, before I got the 400 I was using an 80-200 with a converter and before that a 75-300 (no converter with that, obviously!).


Apologies, i thought you had a 300mm prime previously. Does the AF pack up if you try to use a 75-300 with a TC?
User avatar
61_OTU
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: The Village - nr Shrewsbury
Top
Next
Post a reply

Return to Photos & Cameras

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 242 guests