Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby snippyfsxer » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:47 pm

I frequently run into the rule of thumb that says you shouldn't reduce your MAP more than 3 inches per minute during the descent (cowl flaps closed) to avoid shock cooling.
snippyfsxer
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:33 pm

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Ivan » Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:48 pm

CalClassic prop + panel combo might have implemented this but i haven't tested that.

The Yak-18T can only overheat
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Brett_Henderson » Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:29 pm

Modern metallurgy, has made this less of a problem.. and since airplanes for hire have mandatory rebuild times that expire before much damage can show up.. some people even ignore it altogether.

Talk to an AP guy though.. he'll tell you that there are reasons that some engines use more oil than others.. and that cracked cylinders aren't just random events.

A well thought out descent accomodates gradual power reduction (I shoot for 1" per minute) without any inconveniences.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Fozzer » Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:28 am

...maybe its just funny-old me...

...but in all my Flight Sims I automatically apply Carburettor Heat and/or close the Engine Cowls BEFORE I drastically reduce power, or close the throttle for a landing, to avoid shock-cooling my engine(s) and/or generating Carburettor Ice.

Its something which I now do without even thinking about it, on all my Air Cooled Piston Engines.

Its engrained in my list of; "Important things to do (before I die!)" pasted on the Panel in front of me... ;D...!

Its just one of those dangers which I am always seem to be aware of!... ;)...!

Paul...G-BPLF... 8-)
Last edited by Fozzer on Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27361
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Brett_Henderson » Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:57 am

Yeah..
Last edited by Brett_Henderson on Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby snippyfsxer » Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:45 pm

[quote]Yeah..
snippyfsxer
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:33 pm

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Fozzer » Sat Nov 21, 2009 5:17 am

[quote][quote]Yeah..
Last edited by Fozzer on Sat Nov 21, 2009 5:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27361
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Brett_Henderson » Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:40 am

In many cases, carb-heat also means by-passing the air-filter.. so there's the risk of ingesting debris.

I have the AccuSimm  B377.. It has very complex intake management.. You have to control whether or not forced-air is even used.. then you control the forced air directed to the inter-coolers (they're used to reduce the heat from turbo/super-charging) (the B377 has both).. and of course the carb-heat.

Modern turbo-charged GA engines mated to carbs are almost unheard of. And if there are inter-coolers, you don't normally have controll over how much outside air they avail... it's all a "black box". You manage the whole deal by airspeed and manifold-pressure.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby snippyfsxer » Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:39 pm

Thanks for the great explanations, guys.  I've been looking for the Carb Heat lever on the Beech Duke, but that explains it!
snippyfsxer
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:33 pm

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby BSW727 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:08 am

[quote][quote][quote]Yeah..
BSW727
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Inside a Boeing 727

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Brett_Henderson » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:40 am

I was taught to cancel carb-heat on short final.. If you've had it applied since intitial, landing power-reduction..  no ice will form during that last 1/4 mile.. and having that extra 200RPM for go-around power, can make the difference between climbing out, and slamming into the runway..

Also..  don't retract the flaps until you're out of ground-effect and at Vy.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby BSW727 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:20 am

They didn't want us touching it on short final because after the increase in RPM from pushing it in, you then have to make a power, and or pitch adjustment to maintain the rate of descent.

You still have plenty of power in reserve with the carb heat out for a go-around. You're only holding around 1300 to 1600 RPM for the descent depending on conditions.

Different syllabusses and instructors will have different procedures I guess.

Tough to climb at 67KIAS at 30 flaps.  :'(
BSW727
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Inside a Boeing 727

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Brett_Henderson » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:18 am

Yeah.. different techniques ..

Though I'd much rather adjust my approach for a little extra RPMs.. than compromise my aborted landing by even more RPMs.


[quote]Tough to climb at 67KIAS at 30 flaps.
Last edited by Brett_Henderson on Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby DaveSims » Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:59 pm

[quote]Yeah.. different techniques ..

Though I'd much rather adjust my approach for a little extra RPMs.. than compromise my aborted landing by even more RPMs.


[quote]Tough to climb at 67KIAS at 30 flaps.
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Power reduction/Shock Cooling

Postby Brett_Henderson » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:56 pm

There are arguments for either technique.. except I think that we're talking about different "go-arounds".

I always considered a decision to abort a landing before in ground-effect, as nothing more than a transition from descent to climb. You're still well above stall-speed, and still well above the ground. There's nothing urgent or critical about it.

Now, the critical go-around is where decisions and timing mean the difference between airplanes (an occupants), getting damaged. Imagine a wind-gust as you're flaring..
Last edited by Brett_Henderson on Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brett_Henderson
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:09 am

Next

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 503 guests