Mustang belly landing down-under...

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Mustang belly landing down-under...

Postby C » Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:21 am

User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Mustang belly landing down-under...

Postby expat » Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:22 am

Remarks of the passenger made me smile.
Why would the pilot have chosen to land on the grass and not the runway. On grass you have a real danger of the aircraft digging in and being torn apart. Under the P51 you have a huge mud scoop in the form of the oil cooler, or a wing dropping etc. I would have thought that the runway would have been a better option. Ok, you would have a possible fire risk from the oil cooler, but it is behind the pilot. You would not have a dig in risk and the emergency services would be able to get to you a lot quicker on tarmac than over grass. However, lets hope that she is back in the air soonest.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Mustang belly landing down-under...

Postby C » Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:48 am

Why would the pilot have chosen to land on the grass and not the runway. On grass you have a real danger of the aircraft digging in and being torn apart. Under the P51 you have a huge mud scoop in the form of the oil cooler, or a wing dropping etc. I would have thought that the runway would have been a better option. Ok, you would have a possible fire risk from the oil cooler, but it is behind the pilot. You would not have a dig in risk and the emergency services would be able to get to you a lot quicker on tarmac than over grass. However, lets hope that she is back in the air soonest.

Matt



I was thinking the same, although I do remember the world most experienced Spitfire pilot (at the time) decideing to land a Spit Tr9 at Coventry on the grass too in similar circumstances. Either way, it'll be a mess and very expensive. Maybe a little less shock load on not just the engine but also the bearers and structure landing under power on the grass?
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Mustang belly landing down-under...

Postby DaveSims » Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:51 am

Aircraft tend to slide on grass and grind on pavement.  It is usually a pilot's judgement call, there is nothing in a book saying do it either way.
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Mustang belly landing down-under...

Postby Fozzer » Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:26 pm

My Instructor prefers to land the little C152's on grass if practical...

...less wear in the Tyre treads, he reckons... ;).... ;D....!

(There's a man with the Club's running costs on his mind)... ;)...!

Paul...G-BPLF... ;D...!
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27361
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 468 guests