Helios Crash Update!

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby Saitek » Thu Oct 20, 2005 9:58 am

Very sad. :( Lets hope this doesn't happen again. This really shouldn't have happened. I'm heavily critical though of having two pilots who can't speak the same language flying a plane with 121 lives on board. Doesn't that seem a bit senseless? ::)
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FS
Saitek
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby beefhole » Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:43 pm

I'm heavily critical though of having two pilots who can't speak the same language flying a plane with 121 lives on board. Doesn't that seem a bit senseless? ::)

The Air Brazil (think thats the airline) 707 that crashed on Long Island had a crew that all spoke Spanish, but only the F/O spoke English well enough to communicate with ATC effectively.  This created problems, like when the captain said he wanted to declare a fuel emergency and the copilot continually told ATC that their situation "urgent", instead of declaring an emrgency.

In a nut shell, this is not the first time language barriers have brought down a plane.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby afi0yz » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:11 pm

hmmm, thats weird I posted this exact article or one very similar a few months ago yet nobody responded. wtf? :-/
User avatar
afi0yz
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 4:45 pm
Location: Nor Cal

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby Hagar » Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:13 am

hmmm, thats weird I posted this exact article or one very similar a few months ago yet nobody responded. wtf? :-/

In that case this is not new information & confirms what I said. It's pure speculation & cannot be based on fact. Therefore it's not worth the paper it's printed on or worthy of discussion. The article Dave quoted is dated 08 September 2005. http://www.airdisaster.com/news/0905/08/news.shtml

PS. The incident happened on August 14th, 2005, just over 2 months ago.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby Sytse » Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:20 am

They didn't ignore it, they misunderstood it.  Read the article a little more carefully  

I don't know about you, but I think it's pretty stupid to just continue your flight when you hear an alarm...

To Hagar: are you back? If so, I'm glad you are.  ;)
User avatar
Sytse
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:26 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby Hagar » Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:32 am

[quote]To Hagar: are you back? If so, I'm glad you are.
Last edited by Hagar on Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby beefhole » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:55 pm

I don't know about you, but I think it's pretty stupid to just continue your flight when you hear an alarm...

The alarm that went off meant "improper takeoff configuration" to them.  Neither of them was aware of the secondary meaning.  In planes, things malfunction. They probably assumed the alarm was faulty and pulled the fuse (just for that alarm).  When more alarms went off, they DID try to do something (that's why the pilot was out of the cockpit).  After the second series of alarms, and shortly after the pilot left the cockit, it would appear they both passed out.

Plus, you don't immediately land the plane every time a bell goes off.  It has to be some serious ****.

Of course, this is what is most likely, not necissarily what happened.

Doug, I buy this article's set of circumstances because it was far, far too weird of an accident for there to have not been a set of circumstances such as those described by the article.

Who's ever heard of (non-explosive) decompression bringing down a plane?  

What the hell was the pilot doing out of the cockpit?

Why didn't they just descend?

For now, this article seems to best answer these questions.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Helios Crash Update!

Postby Nexus » Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:51 pm

Sad thruth is...if the pilots would've brought down an aircraft that didnt appear to malfunction....they'd be out of a job afterwards. For sure.

That's how it works in the aviation business, especially for those smaller charter companies that operates without large margins.   :(

And it scares me that the crew didnt know about the Horn...heck even I knew that for christs sake  :(
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Previous

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 431 guests