The new Star Trek movie...

Discuss Movies, Music, TV, etc here.

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby tcco94 » Mon May 25, 2009 11:35 pm

A teacher at my school has a pirated copy and he shows it to his class.

Im hearing from a bunch of my friends (who have his class) that this is a great movie.

Although ill mostly wait till the DVD and watch it since I never happen to go to the movie's very often.
User avatar
tcco94
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:41 am
Location: Bay Area, California

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby JBaymore » Tue May 26, 2009 8:53 am

A teacher at my school has a pirated copy and he shows it to his class.


Some teacher!!!   :o ::)

If his admin knows and he is still there....... some school.  :-X

best,

.................john
Image ImageIntel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 720
User avatar
JBaymore
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 10020
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 9:15 am
Location: New Hampshire

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby tcco94 » Tue May 26, 2009 9:45 am

A teacher at my school has a pirated copy and he shows it to his class.


Some teacher!!!
User avatar
tcco94
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:41 am
Location: Bay Area, California

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby Travis » Wed May 27, 2009 7:40 am

A teacher at my school has a pirated copy and he shows it to his class.


Some teacher!!!
Image
User avatar
Travis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:17 am
Location: KAUS - 30 MI NW

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby RitterKreuz » Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:53 am

great movie.

great plot.

great character acting.

FANTASTIC musical score.

the movie to beat in 2009!

i have seen it three times since opening weekend
RitterKreuz
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:26 am
Location: Texas

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby Alejandro Rhodes » Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:54 pm

great movie.

great plot.

great character acting.

FANTASTIC musical score.

the movie to beat in 2009!

and If I have more money I would probably live in the theater,watchig it over and over and over .. ;D

Really good one
Alejandro Rhodes
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:33 am

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby T1MT1M » Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:38 am

It was ok.
There were times I felt I was watching a rehashed nemesis to be honest, but it was good.
The thing that got me was the computer graphics. To see the enterprise in that new style was absolutely amazing and made the movie.
I'm hoping because of the way its been written we may get a next generation era movie explaining the timeline of events that lead to nero's situation. It's also left open the door for more from this timeline too.



You got it wrong. Not Nemesis. Star Wars  :D. If you haven't seen either movie don't watch, SPOILERS.

SPOILERS
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1910892
T1MT1M
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 9:02 am
Location: Naboo

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby ShaneG_old » Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:43 am

[quote]


You got it wrong. Not Nemesis. Star Wars
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby Alejandro Rhodes » Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:43 am

It was ok.
There were times I felt I was watching a rehashed nemesis to be honest, but it was good.
The thing that got me was the computer graphics. To see the enterprise in that new style was absolutely amazing and made the movie.
I'm hoping because of the way its been written we may get a next generation era movie explaining the timeline of events that lead to nero's situation. It's also left open the door for more from this timeline too.



You got it wrong. Not Nemesis. Star Wars
Alejandro Rhodes
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:33 am

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby Staiduk » Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:42 pm

Hey folks.
(Holy snakes, is Staiduk back on the Internet? Not really - just chilling in a cyber-cafe before my latest doc's appointment.)

Anyhoo, some friends took me to see the new Trek right when it first opened in Edmonton. As opposed to everyone else here; to be frank I really didn't like it at all.

Frankly, I thought it was incredibly dumb.

Sorry in advance - as my heath deteriorates my sense of humour has atrophied as well and I've had a rather grim outlook on things recently. But anyway...

Look, I can understand the idea of taking one of the most phenomenally successful franchises in the history of multi-media science fiction and wanting to change everything that made it good to make it 'new' but could we at least apply some common sense to the whole thing?

The movie had great special effects, great explosions, some funny lines. What it didn't have was the minor things...you know, like a sensible plot.

OK; so they wanted to totally rewrite ST canon - but they went overboard making the 'new' characters come out with the same tired old lines and gags that made the old characters memorable...ignoring the fact that it was the old actors that made those characters memorable.
Granted, Karl Urban is a superb actor and portrayed Bones beautifully. Zoe Saldana (?) who played Uhura (they got her first name wrong, BTW) was utterly lovely as always, and did a damned good job.
Dude that played Spock did a good job of pretending to be Leonard Nimoy.
Kid that played Kirk...well...I'm certain the management of the theatre would have been annoyed if I'd followed my first impulse and threw things at the screen. That idiot was the worse incarnation of a ST captain I've ever seen - and that's saying something. I spent most of the show wanting to wipe that little "Look! I'm William Shatner!!" smirk off his underdeveloped little face.
But overall, I don't blame him - he's just new; thrown into an impossible situation. Was he instructed to be Kirk or Shatner? Either way, he didn't have a chance of succeeding. Shatner was Shatner; there is only one (which is probably for the best...heh heh heh.)
How did the kid stack up as a Starfleet captain? let's just say if he was a member of any military service I've served in, I'd have shot him to get him out of the way.

And so we get to the bits that really annoy me.
Just one quick question: Has anyone in Hollywood ever heard the term 'Chain of Command'? If they have (and I'm sure they have, I believe I heard one of the characters say the words at one point) have they ever paused to consider the implications of that phrase?
Or to put it in really simple terms, has anyone considered that Starfleet is a Military organization?

To put it bluntly, what kind of military would be so unbelievably, phenomenally stupid to allow a hothead with major disciplinary problems, zero experience, emotional issues and a known charge of cheating to take command of a three hundred meter long, heavily armed and ridiculously expensive Constitution-class heavy battlecruiser?
Or to put it in modern terms, to put an Annapolis undergrad in sole command of - say - the battleship New Jersey?

This might be a minor issue; I don't know, but it totally disgusted me and blew any enjoyment I had in the film right out of the water. As a military leader - albeit a very minor one - I wouldn't give a kid like that command of a janitor detail, much less a ship. The idea ignored the entire concept of military advancement - however bright, innovative and eager, a young leader must spend decades learning those skills essential to a commander - organization, planning, discipline, politics (anyone who's ever attended a 'Commanding Officer's dinner' knows what that's about...) personnel management, not to mention the actual physical and technical skills required for the job. Chain of command - in other words, the rank structure - is a grim, often merciless weeding-out process, dropping less than adequate candidates by the wayside.
(Every Annapolis grad, for instance, dreams of commanding a ship of his own. And from what I know, application to Annapolis - the United States' naval academy - is incredibly rigorous. Those that make it into the academy are the top 1% of all applicants. Of those candidates, many will not complete the course and drop out. Of the remainder, only the smallest fraction will have the drive, ability, innate cunning and political savvy to command even smaller vessels. Most will, along the way, fall into positions where their skills will suit them best - supply for instance, or communications. Thus those that do rise to the top are - at least in theory - the cream of the crop.)

It might sound like a nitpick, but that basic issue - undergrad Cadet Kirk winding up in command of the Enterprise as Captain Kirk; somehow missing all the little intervening steps - Ensign, lieutenant, lieutenant-Commander, Commander - three years after signing up for something that looks less like a major Naval Academy than enlisted Basic Training (Show up and jump on the bus? Heck of a selection system there) totally blew it for me.

Back to the film though - The first sight of the Enterprise in space took my breath away - it was an utterly beautiful moment. Regrettably, it was just about the only beautiful moment in the the whole film.

It seems nowadays you can't make an action film without using that incredibly distracting Epileptic-Cameraman-On-Coke jumpy, wiggly, seizure-inducing shooting. Flash, jump, flash, shift, blur, wiggle, jump, flash...then do the next ten seconds even jumpier than the last. You'd think that if a 300m ship was engaging a 3000m ship, simple inertia alone would allow for a shot longer than oh...about 5 seconds.

Anyhoo, this is long and I've got to get to my appointment, I'll wrap it up. Wanted to like it, was really looking forward to it, was utterly disappointed. All glitz, no substance at all. Stupid jokes, stupid lines, no plot and what storyline there was made no sense at all. 15 minutes into the show I found myself saying "10 bucks they find a way to haul Leonard Nimoy out of the closet to give the thing some ST credibility." Geez; I really wish I'd lost that bet.

Later folks.
Image
Staiduk
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 8:12 am

Re: The new Star Trek movie...

Postby Craig. » Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:18 pm

Staid, you picked a lot of the points I made to my friends on the way out of the theater.
I really didn't like the Kirk actor. Just didn't portray it at all. The others did a good job of it, you could imagine them almost as the young counterparts (except Simon Pegg, but thats a role that is harder than Kirks to fill) But his part was rubbish.
It was obvious fron the start that the writers wanted to force Kirk as captain upon us. And they wanted to force the crew together.
As crap as star trek 5 was, that camping scene was, cheesy, but at the same time you got a sense that it was a relaxed friendship amongst the 3 of them. (i know at the time Nimoy wanted to run Shatner down with his car) But the scene just came across well.
You couldn't ever get that from any of the actors in that movie.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Previous

Return to Music, Arts & Entertainment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 454 guests