The motoring speed trap

What are you laughing at?

The motoring speed trap

Postby Theis » Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:23 pm

Two members of the traffic police were out in the countryside with a radar gun recently, happily engaged in apprehending speeding motorists, when their equipment suddenly locked-up completely with an unexpected reading of well over 400 mph.

The mystery was explained seconds later as a low flying Tornado hurtled over their heads.

The boys in blue, upset at the damage to their radar gun, put in a complaint to the RAF, but were somewhat chastened when the RAF pointed out that the damage might well have been more severe. The Tornado's target-seeker had locked on to the 'enemy' radar and triggered an automatic retaliatory air-to-surface missile attack.

Luckily(?), the Tornado was operating unarmed.
Image Bar by Mees
Image
User avatar
Theis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 6:16 am
Location: Denmark

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby Jared » Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:40 pm

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
User avatar
Jared
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Uniontown, Ohio

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby H » Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:17 pm

Oops, how many motorists are now ready to refit with a radar defense system? :o

8)
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby Saitek » Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:36 pm

Lol - is that real?  ???
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FS
Saitek
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby Viper22 » Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:33 pm

I have heard this story several different times, many in different versions.  I think they even tested this on Tv once to see if it was even possible, but I cant seem to remember...
Mess with the best, die like the rest.

Core 2 Duo E6600
Gigabyte 965 DQ6
2GB Mushkin DDR2 800
eVGA 7900 GT KO
250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10
Silverstone Zeus 750W
Thermaltake shark case modded with green fans and
User avatar
Viper22
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: CANADA

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:28 am

Utter pap I'm afraid!

[quote]Origins:   This report has been circulating around the Internet for several years at least. The first sighting I can recall was from around 1995, but it may have appeared somewhat earlier.

The story is almost certainly false for a number of highly technical reasons. First off, police radar is relatively weak
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby Katahu » Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:02 pm

It doesn't matter what the heck the real report says. The story is funny anways and worth posting. ;D
User avatar
Katahu
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5993
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 10:29 pm

Re: The motoring speed trap

Postby H » Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:07 am

Like, how many of these entries in the humor forum are factual or even expected to be.
That report can be slightly misleading, however. Without mentioning which frequency bands, even the old standard TWS SAM radar had a greater range than this states (they've indicated the limits of effective missile launch). The basic beam emission was @ two inches at start and, ideal conditions depending, some acft could have detected it well over 200 miles away. Secondly, if you turned on your jammer when I didn't know you were there, I certainly know now and I'm going to point right at your jamming strobe (there is also a button for TOJ -- Track On Jam); I just don't know exactly how far away you are unless, as you get within the distance mentioned, my return signal begins to break through yours. The hope for the acft is that the missile(s) will not only miss direct physical contact but also explode a (somewhat) safe distance away (shrapnel can be quite deadly, as well).


:o
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA


Return to Humour

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 559 guests