MS vs. Embraer

What are you laughing at?

MS vs. Embraer

Postby Brute » Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:30 pm

At a recent computer
expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry
with the aircraft industry and stated, "If Embraer had kept up with
technology like the computer industry has, we would all be flying
$25.00 planes that go 1,000 miles per hour."

In response to Bill's comments, Embraer issued a press release
stating: If Embraer had developed technology like Microsoft, we would
all be flying planes with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your plane would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted taxiway and runway lines, you would have
to buy a new plane.

3. Occasionally your plane would die on the runway for no reason. You
would have to pull to the side, open all of the doors, shut off the
plane, restart it, and reclose the doors before you could continue.
For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause
your plane to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you
would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Macintosh would make a plane that was powered by the sun, was
reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to fly - but would run
on only five percent of the airways.

6. The oil temperature, pressure and generator warning lights would
all be replaced by a single "This Aircraft Has Performed an Illegal
Operation" warning light.

7. The groundspoiler system would ask "Are you sure?" before
deploying.

8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your plane would lock you
out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door
handle, turned the nosewheel and grabbed hold of the VHF radio
antenna.

9. Every time a new plane was introduced pilots would have to learn
how to fly all over again because none of the controls would operate
in the same manner as the old plane.

10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
Future pilot...so you can scream to god, he cant hear you
User avatar
Brute
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:24 pm

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby Theis » Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:03 am

;D ;D ;D

PW3\/\/D!
Image Bar by Mees
Image
User avatar
Theis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 6:16 am
Location: Denmark

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby the_autopilot » Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:22 am

5. Macintosh would make a plane that was powered by the sun, was
reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to fly - but would run
on only five percent of the airways.


And it would cost 2 as much to buy and you'd have to buy a whole new airplane if one part of it broke or needed to be upgraded.
Link to sig:
Click here
(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
the_autopilot
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1358
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:45 am

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby Saitek » Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:00 am

Brilliant! Really true!
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W

Flying FS
Saitek
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby Tequila Sunrise » Thu Jul 21, 2005 12:39 pm

lol
If someone with multiple personality disorder threatens suicide, is it a hostage situation?

Thou shalt maintain thine airspeed lest the ground shalt rise up and smite thee
User avatar
Tequila Sunrise
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 11:59 am
Location: Glasgow Scotland

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby Triple_7 » Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:50 pm

5. Macintosh would make a plane that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to fly - but would run on only five percent of the airways.


I think even saying 5% is a bit high ::)

All of those are sad but true...Scary isnt it :P
Triple_7
 

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby the_autopilot » Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:12 pm

This article really applies more toward the older windows OS's. Windows XP doesn't really have any of these problems anymore or has at least minimized it severity.
Link to sig:
Click here
(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
the_autopilot
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1358
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 2:45 am

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby DJ_Zephyr » Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:20 pm

This article really applies more toward the older windows OS's. Windows XP doesn't really have any of these problems anymore or has at least minimized it severity.


Really?  Try telling that to my dad's computer.  He's had to reinstall Windows 3 times already, but then, it may be all the additional crap he's installed in futile efforts to "improve" it.

Nice one about the "reinstall the engine!"  Try doing THAT at 10,000 feet!
Image
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ dual-core- 2.2ghz per core
MSI GeForce 9400 GT- 550mhz core, 512mb VRAM
2gb DDR RAM, dual 17" monitors (one Acer panel, one KDS boat anchor)
User avatar
DJ_Zephyr
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:31 am
Location: New Port Richey, FL

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby Corsair Freak » Thu Jul 28, 2005 7:55 pm

This article really applies more toward the older windows OS's. Windows XP doesn't really have any of these problems anymore or has at least minimized it severity.


I agree... My Neighbor's bought a Dell a few years ago... and they've had a computer repair man over there about 4-5 times... I honestly think it's depends on the person using the computer, if I ever encounter serious problems it's my fault, not the OS's...


Brandon
User avatar
Corsair Freak
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S.A.

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby Flt.Lt.Andrew » Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:02 am

Its so, so true.....
Hats off to Embraer....
Reinstall the engine? Reminds me of a pic posted here with the guy spinnin the prop!


A.
Flt.Lt.Andrew
 

Re: MS vs. Embraer

Postby wealthysoup » Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:15 am

6. The oil temperature, pressure and generator warning lights would
all be replaced by a single "This Aircraft Has Performed an Illegal
Operation" warning light.


And that light wouldn't even work well because only Microsoft knows how to make them. :o
Last edited by wealthysoup on Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
My PC specs:
AMD Athlon 64 3200 (@ 2.2ghz)
Asus K8v se deluxe motherboard
1.5gb pc3200 RAM
128mb palit geforce 6600gt
200gb+80gb hard drives
21 inch CRT
5.1 creative surround sound speakers
wealthysoup
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:40 pm
Location: Newtownards, Northern Ireland


Return to Humour

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 576 guests