Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Rifleman » Fri Aug 15, 2003 10:10 pm

I really wasn't looking for special treatment on additions, but since you had questioned " Which Bomber was best? "......I thought it may have been an appropriate inclusion since its no longer in service, but was almost untouchable by interceptors ...........can't deny its great part in the movie " Fail Safe "...............

"..............at least one of our bombers will get through ........"
Image
User avatar
Rifleman
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:44 pm
Location: Tropical island in the Pacific

Re: Superfortress

Postby Professor Brensec » Fri Aug 15, 2003 10:44 pm

[quote]The B-29 should definetly be in there.
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby BFMF » Sat Aug 16, 2003 12:20 am

Famous Strike?

Wouldn't the Attack on Pearl Harbour be a 'famous' strike???
BFMF
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 16266
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:06 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Professor Brensec » Sat Aug 16, 2003 12:32 am

Definitely! If you include 'infamous' in the list of proviso's I mentioned.
Also very successful too!  ;D ;D ;)

There was also a memorable strike on (I think Berlin), when 60 out of 180 B17's didn't come back. A pretty 'memorable' one too!
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Blah

Postby Scorpiоn » Sat Aug 16, 2003 1:27 am

I meant with just a few aircraft facing insurmounable odds.
Last edited by Scorpiоn on Sat Aug 16, 2003 1:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Smoke2much » Sat Aug 16, 2003 4:26 am

I seem to have caused contention, please not the Hee hee hee I added to the title of the poll.  This was intentional.

I was thinking along the lines of WW2 heavies and added Hustler because I'd never heared of it ( :() and I said I would make additions if people requested them.

Please note that the Avro Manchester is in the Poll, could there be a more disastrous attempt at a heavy bomber?  The Manchester was more dangerous to it's crew than the enemy LOL.

I wanted to cause a debate, not blind slavery to the poll.  Most would aggree that it will be, in most minds, a straight fight between the Lanc and the Fort.

On survivability for the crew the best British bomber was the Halifax, you had twice as much chance of surviving than if you were in a Lancaster.

So, ignore the poll, tell us what you think was the best Allied heavy and why.  My list is:

Lancaster for looks and romance value (I don't want to marry one ;))

Halifax because it was safe

Wellington because of the geodedic structure and its adaptability.

B17 because it hammered the German war machine to mulch.

Will
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Professor Brensec » Sat Aug 16, 2003 4:30 am

How about the Ugliest bomber.

Got to be the Blenheim with that horrible nose. Looks like someone decided to remove a 'growth'......lol ;D
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Smoke2much » Sat Aug 16, 2003 5:35 am

I love the Blenheim!  Go outside and castrate yourself Brensec!

Huh.

Will
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: Blah

Postby Hagar » Sat Aug 16, 2003 6:00 am

Never liked British bombers all too much; I've always prefered radials over in-lines, and we all know how the British are fond of their Merlins! ::)

Not all British bombers had Merlins. The Stirling, Wellington, Halifax Marks III, VI and VII & the Lancaster Mark II had radials, usually the Bristol Hercules.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Professor Brensec » Sat Aug 16, 2003 6:05 am

[quote]I love the Blenheim!
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Rifleman » Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:01 am

[quote]I love the Blenheim!
Image
User avatar
Rifleman
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:44 pm
Location: Tropical island in the Pacific

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby HawkerTempest5 » Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:52 am

Whilst no one would argue with the fact that the B-29 was the most advanced bomber to see service in WW2, its pressurised cabin and advanced fire control system where streets ahead of anything else flying, it only arrived at the end and only flew in one theatre of operations.
I, like Scorpion consider the B-29/A-Bomb combo to be the start of the cold war era rather than the end of WW2 era. In it
Image
Flying Legends
User avatar
HawkerTempest5
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2883
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:09 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Could Use a Little Touch Up

Postby Scorpiоn » Sat Aug 16, 2003 2:32 pm

Hagar, I just mean that when you think of British aircraft in general, Merlin pops right in as a synonym.

Oh, and Hawker, I think your statement might be a bit unfair.  To my recollection, the reason the B-29 failed so miserably in Japan was because of high altitude winds.  Jet stream, maybe?  Over Germany we could've popped a river of bombs right on the Reich's head! 8) Although maybe there's a jet stream in Germany too... ???
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: Could Use a Little Touch Up

Postby Ivan » Sat Aug 16, 2003 3:30 pm

[quote]Hagar, I just mean that when you think of British aircraft in general, Merlin pops right in as a synonym.

Oh, and Hawker, I think your statement might be a bit unfair.
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Which Bomber was best (hee hee hee)

Postby Crumbso » Sat Aug 16, 2003 5:14 pm

Well it seems lancaster wins pretty much.
Crumbso
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2001 2:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 668 guests